Royal Commission + 2021 0297 + ZC14D022308 + B01B0837 + E04YM867 + G02EC632 + F02ED793 + G00CR488 + E02YM867 + F00LE923 + HOONR895 + H5DE8G7R + 0120017005133 + More

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Officers, Legal Representatives, and Law Court Judges,

Publicity Negotiation Advice that Citizens use the Publicity Negotiation Precedent to explain the Business Priorities and Operation Constraints of the Citizen and Equity Lawyer. It enables Conflicted Interest Enquiries by Media Managers that identify Journalists, Editors and Publishers who have a Common Interest in Honest Publicity. Attached are the Precedent PDF + Word Version and the Publicity Negotiation Offer of  Citizen Ms Davies as an example.    

The Public Gallery Rights Case 2021 0239 got a Crown Court Case Reference from Hertfordshire to Essex and then a Case Closure Plan Fraud. It needed a Case Acknowledgement Denial Fraud + Case Allocation Fraud + Secret Hearing Listing Fraud + Appearance Failure Pretence Fraud + Case Closure Fraud by the Crown Court. The Case Closure Fraud Conspiracy was discovered by use of Royal Commission Emails for Case Notices that got Acknowledgement Refusals by Chelmsford Crown Court, an Unused Evidence Notice from the Crown Prosecutor was Live Case Evidence, a Telephone Enquiry by the Citizen got Basildon Case Response from Chelmsford Crown Court, a Telephone Enquiry by the Citizen got an Oral Hearing Notice for 2nd November 2021 and then Hearing Notice Screenshot Email from Basildon Crown Court. Investigation is needed to discover who in the Crown Court did what, when and where.  

The Best Advice for Citizen Ms Davies is to impose Written Communications Only Condition + Personal Contact Prohibition against GP Dr Harris and Barbourne Medical Centre Manager Mrs L Tweney and make Fraud + Harassment Profession Unfitness Complaints to the NHS Ombudsman, General Medical Council and a Health Fraud + Harassment Criminal Complaint to Worcestershire Police.

Polite Request that Crime Proceeds Claim 0120017005133 in South West Magistrates Court of Citizen Ms Asha Virji Ekila v Metropolitan Police be used for Conflict Qualification Fraud Conspiracy Defence + Case Dismissal Application + Contempt Liability Claim + Contempt Investigation Application,  attend Lavender4 Hill Magistrates Court for the Directions Hearing at 12 noon on 2nd November 2021 and make an Adjournment + Listing Application that enables Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis and Citizen Mr Nkrumah  + Other Witnesses to attend and give Fraud Conspiracy Evidence against the State and Law Courts.   

The Parliament Session Agreements between the Crown and Prime Minister included Legal Service Crime Prosecution Prohibitions and Civil Court Penalty Enforcement Prohibitions for the Equity Lawyer against the Cabinet. It enabled Case Management by the Equity Lawyer that forced Corrupt Officers to demand Protection Frauds that needed Civil Court Contempt Frauds by Top Judges.  They used Contempt Fraud 2020 000286 Trial Frauds as Commitment Proof from the Law Courts to give Receivers the confidence to commit New Frauds to get Protection Fraud Supplies. The 2020 000286 Liability Finding Fraud on 16th December 2021 got a New Fraud Commitment Proof Set for the Parliament Session Jurisdictions against the Protection Fraud Network.

The Commitment Fraud Proof Set includes the F01PP7696 Mortgage Repayment Refusal Notice Fraud dated that day from Lawyers Walker Morris for Bank of Scotland with intent to get Possession Fraud Completion by the Romford Judges. The Fraud B01B0837 broke the confidence of County Court Judges to complete the Trust Frauds for Younger Trustee Son Mr Vishal Sood against Citizen Mr Sood. It prevented completion of the F01PP7696 Mortgage Possession Fraud. Sale Negligence got a Negligence Admission + £27,000 Settlement Agreement + Payment Default + Settlement Payment Claim E04YM867 + Case Closure Fraud for Lawyer Mr Ross Coates + Trust Accounting Denial Frauds by the Older Trustee Son Mr Ritesh Sood. A E04YM867 Claim Revival Decision + Questionnaire Filing Order dated 14th June 2021 got a Questionnaire Response + Proposals Filing and Service Email on 1st July 2021 by the Equity Lawyer for Citizen Mr Sood with a Case Reference Error of E02YM867 instead of E04YM867. The 8 Day Filing Time Limit Order dated 6th October 2021 got an Updated Questionnaire Response dated 11th October 2021 and case management Best Advice + Unsigned Response Filing + Service Email on 12th October 2021 from the Equity Lawyer to the Court and Parties. It got Signed Response Filing + Notice Email from Citizen Mr Sood to the Court and Equity Lawyer. A Telephone Call from Citizen Mr Sood got Oral Acceptance + No Personal Attendance Stay Away Request from Court Officer Mrs Patel. All of it got an Intervention Email at 13 14 on 13th October 2021 from the Older Trustee Son Mr Ritesh Sood to the County Court and Citizen Mr Sood and Equity Lawyer that reads  ‘FAO Romford County Court, Please do not accept any further applications from Sham Sood.  The man is mentally unwell and has nothing better to do than keep listing applications. There are already several applications listed to take place on the 17th of December and I believe the defendant is attempting to abuse the system by submitting further applications and delay the inevitable outcome. I attached evidence of the hearing and trust this will be sufficient.‘ The circumstances raise reasonable Suspicions that the Older Son Trustee Mr Ritesh Sood obtained an Undisclosed Benefit from the E04YM867 Case Closure Fraud. The Best Advice for Lawyer Mr Ross Coates was for Voluntary Full Disclosure + Voluntary Settlement Negotiations. The Best Advice for the Romford Judges was a Disclosure Order + Settlement Meeting Order for Citizen Mr Sood against Lawyer Mr Ross Coates. The Intervention Email supports the Best Advice.  It adds to Reasonable Suspicions that:

  1. Alleged Business Losses were Trust Assets Thefts by the Older Trustee Son against the Citizen Beneficiary Father
  2. Co-ordinated Case Management Frauds by Both Trustee Sons against the Citizen Beneficiary Father

All of it supports the Remedy Arguments for Co-ordinated Management of Contempt Investigation by the Law Courts of All Cases in which Citizen Mr Sood was a Claimant, Defendant or Interested Party and an Investigator Appointment Case Reference to the Cabinet 

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.