To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councilors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges
Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Trial Adjournment Order Amendment Demand for the Stated Reason it omits the Medical Records Production Refusal for the Ministry of Health and Mid Sussex Hospital Trust against the Equity Lawyer. The Admissions, Findings and Order Applications detailed in the Proposals dated 31st October 2020 included Party Status and Profession Unfitness Investigation Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the General Medical Council to remedy the Health Frauds committed by Top Doctors. They got Refusal Decisions by the Trial Judge who then gave Medical Evidence Filing Permission. It required the Equity Lawyer to ask the Top Doctors who committed the Health Frauds for Medical Opinions. The Equity Lawyer asked for a Medical Evidence Production Order against the Ministry of Health and Mid Sussex Hospital Authority because it evidenced the Medical Frauds and the Treatment Needs. The Medical Frauds included a Secret Diagnosis Fraud and Prescription Fraud to get Urea Retention Side effects that were a Urea Poison Fraud and a Dialysis Treatment Sabotage Fraud. Drug Questions got Embarrassed Behaviour by the Drugs Nurse and a Case Reference to Renal Doctors. They could not explain the Urea Poison Fraud. They lacked the confidence for a Forced Medication Fraud. The Medical Records and Drug Audit Records prove it. The Trial Order includes the Medical Evidence Filing Permission but omits the Medical Records Access Denial Fraud.
Adjourned Trial Date and Time Limit Change Possibility Notice to the High Court. The Evidence Balance starts with a Validity Presumption for the Citizen subject to Rebuttal Proof from the State. The Adjournment Application by the Equity Lawyer used a Tiredness Reason. The State did not offer Rebuttal Proof. The Trial Judge did not ask for Rebuttal Proof. and made a Doubt Finding against the Equity Lawyer and a Doubt Benefit Finding for the Equity Lawyer. They were Evidence Frauds and Finding Frauds. Less than 24 hours later the Renal Team used the Dialysis Session on 4th November 2020 to inform Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis that the Blood Test Results merit an increase from 2 to 3 Dialysis Sessions a week. He said that they had not allowed him access to the Blood Test Results or disclosed High Toxin Results and thereby delayed Diet Changes by him. He explained that he implemented Diet Changes as soon as he knew about the High Toxin Results. They agreed to New Tests to discover whether the Diet Changes were good enough for 2 Sessions a week.
Citizen Father Mr Sood has Limited English Language and Case Management Incapacity to cope with a Criminal Conspiracy by his Son and Law Court Judges for Incapacity Exploitation Frauds and Hearing Frauds. He filed and served Draft Orders that explained his case. He did not participate in the Telephone Hearing on 23rd October 2020. It got a Pending Superior Adjudication Adjudication Enforcement Stay Protection Refusal by the County Court. The Fraud Appeals got Appeal Jurisdiction Denials by the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal and County Court claimed the High Court has Appeal Jurisdiction. The High Court used Participation Failure in the Telephone Hearing for an Appeal Denial Fraud. It forced a Set Aside Application in the County Court. All of it is Criminal Conspiracy Proof and Pending Adjudication Protection Denial Fraud Proof against the Officers and Judges of the Law Courts. Honourable Parliamentarians can ask Prime Minister Mr Johnson to explain what he did to procure Fraud Beneficiary Status in the High Court Corruption Claim and Court of Appeal Fraud Appeal.
Citizen Mr Sood will please file the attached Set Aside Application Notice and Draft Orders.
Honourable Parliamentarians will please ask the Fraud Beneficiary Status Questions.
Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis2020-11-05-Royal-Commission-Trust-Claim-Fraud-B01B0837-Remedy-Application-Notice-of-Citizen-Father-Mr-Sood-v-Trustee-Son-Mr-Sood