Royal Commission, Contempt Fraud Complaint against the House of CommonsSpeaker and Court of Appeal, 2021 PI 10069, YYYY and ZZZZ

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Officers, Law Court Judges and Law Court Judges

Contempt Fraud Complaint against the House of Commons Speaker

The Parliament Contempt Remedy Jurisdiction and the Session Hearing Jurisdiction get Justice Office Status and the Uncontested Seat Electoral Convention for the House of Commons Speaker. Royal Commission Emails to House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <Lindsay.hoyle.mp@parliament.uk> got Automatic Replies that claimed a Political Representation Jurisdiction for Constituents Only and referred All Others to the Email Address <speakersoffice@parliament.uk>. The Remedy Responsibility Acknowledgement Failure is Contempt Fraud Proof for the Citizen, Parliament, Crown and People against the House of Commons Speaker.

Contempt Fraud Complaint against the Royal Courts Fee Office and the Court of Appeal

  1. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Filing Acknowledgement 43 Day Delay Fraud, Conflict Disqualification Denial Contempt Fraud, Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit Denial Contempt Fraud, Master Identity Non-Disclosure Contempt Fraud, Appellant Notice Deficit Pretence Fraud and Repeat Filing Requirement Fraud

    The Recusal Refusal Fraud and Trial Fraud Appeal got a 43 Day Filing Acknowledgement Denial Fraud from the Sign For Post NY022186103GB Receipt on 24th November 2020 until the Acknowledgment + Reference 2021 PI 10063 Notice Email at 16.08 on 7th January 2021 from Administrative Officer Mr Peter Coburn that read

    ‘I acknowledge receipt of your papers, which this office received on 24.11.20. Your papers were referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you of the following: “If Mr Ellis is seeking to appeal an order in addition to the order of 3.11.20 he must file an appellant’s notice clearly showing the date of the order in section 2 and a copy of the order being appealed. The appellant notice in relation to the order of 3.11.20 will be issued.” Please quote 2021/PI/10063 in correspondence.’

    It is an Appellant Notice Deficit Pretence Fraud and Repeat Filing Requirement Fraud because the Appellant Notice disclosed in section 2 the Judge Identity of Justice Mr Jay and the Order Date of 3rd November 2020
  2. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Conflict Disqualification Denial Contempt Fraud, Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit Denial Contempt Fraud, Master Identity Non-Disclosure Fraud, Attempted Withdrawal Procurement Fraud and Response 7 Day Time Limit Fraud

    The Recusal Refusal Fraud and Trial Fraud Appeal Attempted Withdrawal Procurement Fraud Email at 14.57 on 8th January 2021 from Court of Appeal Officer Mr Yomi Oba that read

    Dear Sir/Madam, I acknowledge receipt of your papers, which this office received on 24.11.20 Your papers were referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you of the following: “Please confirm whether you still wish to pursue an application for permission to appeal from the order of Jay J dated 3/11/20 refusing to recuse himself. Jay J reconsidered his decision and the order of 9/11/20 confirms that Jay J did recuse himself.  An appeal from the order of 3/11/20, therefore, appears to be academic” You have 7 days from the date on this letter to reply. Please quote 2021/PI/10063 in correspondence.

    The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops managed a Corruption Remedy Process. It needed Corruption Investigations of the Law Courts using Investigation Services by Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis. Corrupt Officers lost confidence. They demanded Protection Frauds from Top Judges. They tried to defend themselves with Computer Record Frauds that were Case Misrepresentation Frauds and Identity Misrepresentation Frauds for Corrupt Officers, Corrupt Representatives and Corrupt Judges. It created the need for Audio Records that are Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals or Hearing Denial Fraud Proof that is Audio record Denial Proof. The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 was the lead Case for getting Audio Records.

    The Worst Risk in the Protection Fraud Market is that Corrupt Officers trade Remedy Co-operation that gets Protection Fraud Proof against Suppliers in exchange for Immunity Terms. Top Judges control the Immunity Risk by requiring Fraud Beneficiaries to provide Fraud Commitment Proof before the Protection Fraud Supply. The State Officers, State Counsel and Trial Judges demanded the Fraud Commitment Proof of Appeal Process Denial Frauds by the Court of Appeal before delivering the Prosecution Frauds. The Court of Appeal demanded Fraud Commitment Proof from Protection Fraud Beneficiaries before delivery of the Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 Dismissal Fraud. The Fraud Commitment Proof they got from Lower Court Judges was Case Frauds against Citizens who serviced the Remedy Process. The Fraud Commitment Proof they got from Sussex Police was a Sex Crime Investigation Fraud against Citizen Mr Taylor who had serviced the Remedy Process.

    The Remedy Process needed the Audio Records and Decision Proof before procuring the Forced Recusal. It got the Forced Recusal and Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud for the Trial Directions that were the Crime Proceeds of the Recusal Refusal Fraud.
  3. The Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Frauds on 14th, 16th and 18th December 2020 by Trial Judge Mrs Cutts got the 5th Fraud Appeal, Bundle Filing Email on 21st December 2020 by the Equity Lawyer and Automatic Acknowledgement Emails from the Court of Appeal and Appeal Process Denial Fraud Proof for the Equity Lawyer against the Court of Appeal    
  4. Fraud Appeal Fee Remission Process Denial Frauds by Fee Officers

    The Royal Commission, 5 Trial Fraud Appeal and Fraud Appeals x 5 Bundle Filing Email on 21st December 2020 got the Automatic Response Emails from the Court of Appeal and the Fees Office using Fees (RCJ) at 17 02 on 22nd December 2020 that reads, ‘Thank you for your email. If your query is in relation to Help With Fees, please ensure you have provided your HWF reference, a copy of the document you are applying for Help with Fees for, which Division the application is for and the court fee you would be paying. Any request that does not comply with this will not be processed. For other Fees queries, we aim to respond within to emails within 3-5 working days.’

    The 5th Fraud Appeal got No Further Response from the Fees Office and No Substantive Filing Acknowledgement by the Court of Appeal.

    The Royal Commission Email on 6th January 2021 made Remedy Proposals and gave Reasons that explained the Protection Fraud Criminal Conspiracy by Top Judges. It got the Irrelevance Notice Response Email at 09.39 on 7th January 2021 from Fee Administration Officer Mr Stuart Dabbs that reads ‘Dear Sirs, Upon checking the contents of this email I am unable to find anything that would explain why it has been sent to the fees office. Unless you have specific requests of the fees office please refrain from sending us emails that do not concern us.’

    A Contempt Fraud Investigation is needed to discover whether Fee Officers received Process Denial Fraud Orders and that the True Intent of the Irrelevance Notice Response Email was a Process Acknowledgment that they dare not make in any other way

Special Request for Fee Remission Services for the 5th Fraud Appeal

Remedy Proposal for

  1. Restraint Renewal Fraud Appeal 2020 0396 Dismissal Contempt Fraud Admissions, Contempt Fraud Dismissal Revocation, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order ad Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Directions 1 Hour Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
  2. Restraint Breach Prosecution Permission Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 Dismissal Fraud Contempt Admissions, Contempt Fraud Dismissal Revocation Decisions, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Remedy 1 Hour Hearing Order for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
  3. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Start Fraud, Trial Adjournment Directions Fraud dated 3rd November 2019 Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Filing Acknowledgment 43 Day Delay Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
  4. Recusal, Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud dated 9th November 2019 Appeal Filing Acknowledgment 43 Day Delay Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
  5. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Frauds dated 14th and 16th and 18th December 2020 Appeal Filing Acknowledgment Denial Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General

Without Prejudice to Invalidity Arguments Repeat Filing of the Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Directions Fraud Appellant Notice and Recusal Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud Appellant Notice 

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-11-16-Contempt-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-2020-XXXX-Recusal-Refusal-Trial-Directions-Fraud-Appellant-Notice-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General-n161-eng

2020-11-16-Contempt-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-2020-YYYY-Recusal-Trial-Directions-Confirmation-Fraud-Appellant-Notice-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General-n161-eng-

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.