Equity Governance UK

The choice for All MPs is to  set a New Governance Standard by making a Super Human Rights Declaration for the People against the Authorities. 

The Cabinet can do it by amending the Immigration Bill. The words in the schedule force the European Court of Human Rights to enforce the Superior Human Right or risk Total Collapse of the European Convention.  

Equity Lawyer Mr Edward Ellis 

The Schedule 

Superior Human Rights Declaration for the Citizen against the State, Profession Authorities, Law Courts, and Parliament Courts

1. The Common Obligation of one and all, proportionate to the circumstances, is to serve as Citizen, use reliable objectivity to discover the truth, reason justice, thereby manage the Justice Priority of the People and achieve the best chance of enduring peace.
2. The Individual qualifies as Citizen by giving a Privilege Waiver, Confidentiality Waiver and Case Management Authority for use of the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth for Integrity Tests of the Authorities.
3. The Integrity Tests:
   1. Use Case Priority for the Corruption Case of the Citizen against All Other Cases.
   2. Use Pending Remedies Enforcement Stay Protection Rights for the Citizen against the State, Profession Authorities and Law Courts. A Protection Breach is a Justice Process Contempt. It gets Contempt Penalty Rights for the Citizen and People against everyone All Responsible Parties
   3. Use the Objective Corruption Remedy Proof Standard for Corruption Cases against the State, Remedy Denial Fraud Cases against the Law Courts, Unfitness Cases against Top Officers of State and Law, and Parliament Session Priority Cases. It is Official Records, and Official Record Failures, that are Justice Proof for Honourable Officers or Guilt Proof against Corrupt Officers and Credibility Irrelevance Proof for the Victim.
   4. Use a Credible Neutrality Qualification for Justice Offices that:
      1. Requires the Voluntary Disclosure by each Justice Officer of anything that is or might be a Conflict Interest that raises Credibility Doubts against Witnesses and Complainants, and Neutrality Doubts about the investigator, prosecutor, defender, and adjudicator.
      2. Requires tenure of any Justice Office Tenure for a Conflict Disqualification against All Other Justice Offices later in a Case Process.
   5. Use of Equal Status for Case Parties by
      1. Separation of Rights Definition Jurisdictions from Rights Enforcement Jurisdictions,
      2. Prohibition against use of Rights Definitions for a Party against another Party by any Justice Officer in Rights Enforcement Cases in the Jurisdiction Trial and Liability Trials
      3. Provision of Expertise Inequality Remedies that are proportionate to the Case Complexity
      4. Use an Evidence Balance that starts with a Validity Presumption for the Citizen and Credibility Presumption for the State both of which are subject to Rebuttal Proof Positive.  
      5. Use the Objective Probability Proof Standard for Civil Cases,
      6. Use the Objective Beyond All Reasonable Doubt Proof Standard for Criminal Cases
   6. Use of the Absolute Priority in every case of a Validity Investigation to discover:
      1. Whether a Case Priority Breach, Credible Neutrality Breach or Party Equality Breach gets Invalid Status for any of the Process Evidence
      2. Whether any Fraud Proof gets a Proof Burden Reversal and Fraud Presumption of everything else for the Victim against the Fraud Manager and Fraud Beneficiary subject to Rebuttal Proof Positive   

4.       The Corruption Control Powers of the Citizen are a Superior Human Right in addition to Human Rights defined by the European Convention.

5.       A Superior Human Rights Enforcement Breach by the European Court of Human Rights shall be a Protection Fraud against the People that incurs the Breach Penalty of a Convention Withdrawal by the UK State from the European Convention to set a Superior Human Rights Standard for the world.