The Corruption Remedy Process continues

To: Prime Minister, Attorney General, Opposition Leader, Other Party Leaders + All MPs,

The Corruption Claims and Election Fairness Claims continue to get Issue Denial Fraud Proof, Dismissal Fraud Proof and Restraint Fraud Proof against the High Court Masters and Justices. The choice for Political Party Leaders is to deliver Corruption Remedies for the Victims or create Remedy Denial Fraud Proof for the Crown and Parliament against themselves. The Remedy Denial Fraud Proof will be Election Fraud Proof for the People, Crown and Parliament against All Liable Parties.

The Political Party Leaders can use the Corruption Remedy Cases to make Consent Remedy Order Agreements with the Victims. Mass Remedies needs Profession Practice Monopoly Enforcement Restraint Orders against the State and Profession Authorities.  The Criminal Conspiracy Proof includes State Ordered Murder Proof against Doctors and Court Fraud Proof against Lawyers and Law Court Judges.  

The Harassment Frauds by West Yorkshire Police, Sussex Police and Cheshire Police against Citizens Mr Awodiya, Mr Taylor and Mr Mustafa are Similar Fact Fraud Proof for Election Fraud Claims.

A Parental Consent Request and Reasons Denial Fraud by the Head Master of a Local School aroused the suspicions of Citizen Mr Awodiya. He discovered Without Parental Consent Medication Frauds and Disabled Child Budget Frauds. He made Fraud Complaints that got the Rapid Response of Firearms Possession Defamation Frauds + Violent Personality Defamation Frauds by West Yorkshire Police.  He and his wife got Criminal Conspiracy Proof against Government Lawyers and the Law Courts. It included Forgery and Perjury. It included Law Practice Registration Denial Frauds. Citizen Mr Awodiya used it to get Criminal Conspiracy Protection Fraud Proof against the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The High Court Judges dare not make Dismissal Orders or Trial Orders in Corruption Cases.  There were Harassment Frauds by Leeds City Council, West Yorkshire Police and the Law Courts. Citizen Mr Awodiya got issue of Election Fairness Claim QB 2019 003126. It got Dismissal Fraud Proof and Restraint Fraud Proof against High Court Judges. The result is Fraud QB 2019 003126 Revocation Application and Fraud Appeals QA 2019 000296 and 2019 2700 in the High Court and Court of Appeal. The Party Leaders have an Open Invitation to make Consent Remedy order Agreements with Citizen Mr Awodiya.  

In 2015 Citizen Mr Taylor stood as an Independent Candidate for the Brighton Kemptown Seat. He had a Corruption Remedy Campaign. He wanted a Competent Investigation of the Katrina Taylor Murder.  It got Election Sabotage Fraud Proof against the Media and Sussex Police. In 2019 his Parliamentary Candidate Announcement got the Raid Response of Harassment Frauds by Sussex Police. He filed an Election Fairness Claim that got Issue Denial Fraud Proof against the High Court.

In April 2019 Misrepresentation Frauds deceived Citizen Mr Mustafa into believing he was the Labour Candidate for the Crewe Central Ward of Cheshire Council. He realised on Candidacy Closure Day that was not the case stood as an Independent Candidate. He used the Campaign Period for Election Research. It got Election Campaign Sabotage Fraud Proof for him the Crown and Parliament. The Bias Fraud Proof for Citizen Mr Mustafa against the Cheshire Authorities included a Racist Prosecution Fraud for a White Petrol Station Manager and against him and a Racist Complaint Denial Fraud for her against him. The Crown Court was faced with a Racist Trial Fraud and a Black Man who had a Race Prejudice Defence. The Case Management by Citizen Mr Mustafa got Crown Court Audio Records that are Trial Fraud Conspiracy Proof against the Crown Prosecutor and the Trial Judges. All MPs had Due Notice. The Cheshire MPs had Special Notice. When it became obvious there would be a General Election there was Internet Publicity for Defamation Frauds against Citizen Mr Mustafa and Harassment Frauds by Cheshire Police.          

The Business Recovery Claim QB 2019 003741 was issued for Damage Mitigation in a Corruption Claim against the Metropolitan Police and Justice Ministry. The Attorney General and Law Society have Defendant Status because Mitigation Management needs Immunity Powers and Law Practice Monopoly Enforcement Prohibition. The Corruption Claim has been prepared for filing on Tuesday 5th November 2019.

The Political Party Leaders and All Parliamentary Candidates have an Open Invitation to support the Damage Mitigation Remedy Applications to the High Court.

The Nuisance Fraud E08YJ260 and Fraud Appeals QA 2019 000205 and 000265 were prosecuted to get Forced Sale of 5 Windlesham Gardens, Brighton for a Property Development. The Forced Sale Criminal Conspiracy used Nuisance Complaint Denial Frauds and Early Morning Noisy Dust Bin Nuisance Harassment by Brighton and Hove City Council and Criminal Prosecution Frauds by Sussex Police. The Secret Service very helpfully created Integrity Test Conditions that got Criminal Conspiracy Proof against the Claim Lawyers, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges.  The Appeal Dismissal Fraud and Restraint Fraud needed Fraud Commitment Proof from the Corrupt Officers. The Commitment Proof it got included the use of Uniformed Officers of Sussex Police for Personal Service in the Late Night and Early Morning of Civil Claim Papers that bore the Royal Mail Post Mark. The Royal Mail Post Man noticed the Post Mark and volunteered the evidence that he had not delivered it.

The Political Party Leaders and All Parliamentary Candidates have an Open Invitation to support the Law Profession Unfitness Complaint and Practice Intervention Application of the Victim to the Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority and Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.    

All of it is Relevant Evidence for Parliament Session Decisions made by the Crown and Lord Bishops

Equity Lawyer Mr Edward William Ellis 

2019-11-04-Remedy-Process-Unfitness-Cases-Election-Fairness-Claim-Form-Content-of-Citizen-Mr-Mustafa-v-Party-Leaders-State-Media

2019-11-04-10-26-Remedy-Process-Office-Unfitness-Cases-The-late-Mr-CS-Ellis-Discretionary-Policy-Case-Ref-PP-JB-40567-Email-

2019-11-03-Law-Profession-Unfitness-Complaints-Notice-Practice-Registration-Details-Request-of-Citizen-Mr-Bradley-v-Timothy-Deacon-and-All-Lawyers-at-Burnand-Brazier-Malcolm-Wilson

2019-11-03-Remedy-Process-Unfitness-Cases-Law-Profession-Unfitness-Complaints-Intervention-Application-of-Citizen-Mr-Bradley-v-Burnand-Brazier-Malolcm-Wilson

2019-11-03-Election-Fairness-Claim-Form-4-pages-Signature-of-Citizen-Mr-Mustafa-v-Party-Leaders-State-Natwich-and-Crewe-Candidate

2019-11-02-Remedy-Process-Unfitness-Cases-Nuisance-and-Restraint-Fraud-Appeal-Revocation-Application-Grounds-Filing-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Bradley-v-Mr-and-Mrs-Faull

2019-11-02-Remedy-Process-Office-Unfitness-Cases-Nuisance-Fraud-and-Restraint-Fraud-Appeal-Grounds-of-Citizen-Mr-Bradley-v-Mr-and-Mrs-Faull

2019-11-02-Posting-Receipt-Dr-Spivack-to-CEO-Utility-Warehouse

2019-11-01-Remedy-Process-Office-Unfitness-Cases-Corruption-Claim-QB-2019-Remedy-Application-of-Citizen-Mr-Yediayli-v-State

2019-11-01-Remedy-Process-Office-Unfitness-Cases-Business-Recovery-Remedy-Draft-Order-of-Citizen-Mr-Yediayli-v-Buyers-Mr-Ahmed-Mr-Hussin

2019-10-31-Corruption-Claim-QB-2019-Remedy-Draft-Order-for-Citizen-Mr-Yediayli-v-State

2019-10-31-Corruption-Claim-Application-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Yedialyli-v-State-n244-eng-Copy

2019-10-31-Business-Recovery-Application-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Yedialyli-v-Buyer-Mr-Ahmed-n244-eng-

2019-10-30-Corrutpion-Claim-Remedy-Application-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Awodiya-v-State-n244-eng

2019-10-30-Corruption-Claim-Form-of-Citizen-Mr-Bayram-Yediayli-v-Metropolitan-Police-Justice-Ministry-Attorney-General-n1-eng

Remedy Process, Judicial Office Unfitness Cases, Election Frauds and More Update Email from Equity Lawyer to Parliament

Prime Minister, Attorney General, Opposition Leader, Other Party Leaders + All MPs

The Election Fairness Claim + Housing Repair Denial Fraud Claim got Bias Frauds by High Court Judges against the Citizen. The Fraud Beneficiaries are the Political Party Leaders and All Other Defendants. The Bias Frauds got a Claim QB 2019 003126 Fraud Revocation Application to the High Court Senior Master and Fraud Appeal QA 2019 000296 to High Court Justices and Fraud Appeal 2019 2700 to the Court of Appeal. The choice for the Fraud Beneficiaries is Remedy Co-operation with Settlement Negotiations and Consent Remedy Orders or Remedy Denial Frauds. The Application and Appeal Papers are attached.

The Special Protection Rights from the Crown and Parliament include Legal Assistance Crime Prosecution Prohibitions and Civil Restraint Contempt Enforcement Prohibitions for the Equity Lawyer against the State and Law Courts. On 13th June 2019 the Contempt Claim Fraud QB18X00347 Trial got Special Protection Admission Proof against the Attorney General and Law Courts. It was presentation of the Contempt Orders against the Equity Lawyer and failure to make an Application or use Court Motion Powers for Breach Enforcement.    The Bias Fraud dated 14th October 2014 of the High Court Justice has added to the Admission Proof because:

  1. It does not take Enforcement Action.
  2. It purports to create a Restraint Disclosure Obligation on the Equity Lawyer and a Restraint Breach Contempt Liability for Citizens who service the Corruption Remedy Process. The Combination of the Special Protection Admission and the Contempt Penalty Threats are Intimidation Fraud Proof + Aggravated Contempt Fraud Proof for the Citizen, Equity Lawyer, Crown and Parliament against the High Court Justice.
  3. It is an Influence Fraud against Court Officers. It reads ‘The Court Staff shall be under no obligation to issue any claim or application notice or to grant a fee remission certificate in any matter in which Mr Ellis is purporting to act as litigation friend for any claimant acting in person unless Mr Ellis first provides them with a copy of an order of a Judge of the High Court granting him permission pursuant to the terms of the Civil Restraint Order of Mrs Justice May DBE dated 22nd February 2018 in Claim No QB16X00733’.

On 23rd October 2019 Citizen Mr Awodiya filed 3 Fee Remission Applications. He was given Certificate PA19-132592 for the Fraud Revocation £255 Application Fee and Certificate PA19-132588 for the Fraud Appeal £240 High Court Fee. The Fee Officer asked for Income Proof before issue of the Certificate for the Court of Appeal Fee.    

On 23rd October 2019 the Equity Lawyer used the Election Fairness Particulars + Revocation Application Grounds + Appeal Grounds for an Influence Fraud Test. He showed the Order dated 14th October 2019 to the Counter Officer in the High Court Listing Office and asked to file one of each document in the Nuisance Fraud Appeal QA2019 000265 for Citizen Mr Bradley.  The Court Officer took the papers into the Supervisor’s Office, reappeared and gave Stamp Filing Proof on the Case Papers and kept one of each for the Nuisance fraud Appeal File. The Equity Lawyer gave a Brief Case Status Explanation for the Election Fairness Claim.  The Counter Officer listened with Respectful Interest.

The High Court will have to decide whether filing the Claim Particulars + Fraud Revocations Application + Fraud Appeals was Court Contempt by Citizen + Prospective Parliamentary Candidate Mr Awodiya  

On 22nd October 2019 the Nuisance Fraud Appeal QA 2019 000265 got a Permission Refusal + Restraint Orders against Citizen Mr Bradley for Mr and Mrs Faull.

On 29th October 2019 the Restraint Breach Fraud Appeal 2018 00198 got Permission Refusal Fraud Proof against the Court of Appeal.  Citizen Mr Pead used it for the Election Fairness Claim. The Claim Form is attached.

Equity Lawyer Mr Edward William Ellis 

2019-10-22-Election-Fairness-Claim-QB-20919-003126-Invalid-Order-Appeal-Grounds-stamp-x-1-in-Citizen-Mr-Awodiya-v-Leaders-State-Media

2019-10-22-Election-Fairness-Claim-QB-20919-003126-Without-Prejudice-Claim-Particulars-stamp-x-1-in-Citizen-Mr-Awodiya-v-Leaders-State-Media

2019-10-28-Remedy-Process-Election-Fairness-Claim-QB-2019-003126-Strike-Out-Restraint-All-Other-Decisions-Appeal-Grounds-of-the-Citizen-Mr-Awodiya-v-Party-Leaders-State-Media-1

2019-10-28-Remedy-Process-Judicial-Office-Unfitness-Cases-Election-Fairness-Cases-Contempt-Fraud-Remedy-Application-Grounds-of-Citizen-Mr-Awodiya-v-Party-Leaders-State-Media

2019-10-29-Election-Fairness-Claim-Form-of-Citizen-Mr-Pead-v-Party-Leaders-State-Judges-

2019-10-29-Election-Fairness-Claim-Party-Details-of-Citizen-Mr-Pead-v-Party-Leaders-State-Judges-

2019-10-29-Election-Fairness-Claim-Remedy-Application-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Pead-v-Party-Leaders-State-Judges-

2019-10-29-Election-Fairrness-2019-000296-Case-Management-Appeal-Appellant-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Awodiya-v-Party-Leaders-State-Media

2019-10-29-Election-Fairrness-2019-2700-Remedy-Application-Denial-Fraud-Appeal-Appellant-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Awodiya-v-Party-Leaders-State-Media

Remedy Process, Mass Remedies and Election Fairness Claim

Prime Minister, Attorney General, Opposition Leader, Other Party Leaders and All MPs,

The Election Fairness Claim got Criminal Conspiracy Proof against High Court Judges. It enables Remedy Tests of Political Party Leaders. They can make Mass Remedy Agreements with the Citizen or by failure to do so create Election Fraud Proof against themselves. It will be part of the Ultimate Sanction Proof Set.   

On Friday the attached DRAFT Remedy Order was filed in the High Court as a Settlement Negotiation Start. It is 1864 words of which 1518 are the Stated Reasons. The Claim Particulars will need to be about 5,000 words. There should be no need to write it. The MPs know the substance of the content. The States Reasons explain the circumstances up to the Ruin Fraud Conspiracy against Prime Minister Mr Cameron. It was a Contempt Fraud against him, the Crown and Parliament.  It failed. It got an Ultimate Sanction Proof Set. The Crown and Lord Bishops used it to get the 2017 Surprise General Election and a Long Session of 2 ½ years. It enabled Protection Fraud Investigations in Parliament. They got Criminal Conspiracy Proof against Corrupt MPs. It is Court Fraud Proof against State Officers, Law Court Judges and Corrupt MPs. The DRAFT Remedy Order focuses on the Election Fairness Claim. The Settlement Terms need to deliver Mass Remedies with Corruption Findings + Remedy Entitlement Findings + Remedy Priority Findings + Mass Enforcement Stays + Liberty Restoration + Reputation Restoration + Estate Restoration for the Victims, Citizens, Crown, Parliament and People and Dismissal Decisions + Terrorism Penalties against Organised Criminals, Corrupt Officers and Law Court Judges.  The Mass Enforcement Stays will be against the State and Law Courts to identify and remedy Liability Frauds and Disproportionate Enforcement Frauds.

Continue reading

Remedy Process, Office Unfitness Cases, Contempt Frauds and Other Cases Investigation Enquiries

Prime Minister, Attorney General, Opposition Leader and All MPs,

The 1st Criminal Trial Fraud against Citizen Mr Pead used an Invented Complainant + Complaint Fraud. It got a Restraint Fraud. It was an Obvious Self-Evident Fraud because the Crown Court did not have the power to make it. The Norfolk Authorities used the Obvious Fraud for the 7th Criminal Trial Fraud. It is Restraint Breach Contempt 2017 0417 Trial Fraud. The Remedy Process broke the confidence that MPs and Law Court Judges could provide Protection Frauds. Corrupt Officers used Total Destruction of the 1st Criminal Trial Records for a Protection Fraud. The Norfolk Authorities were left with the Obvious Fraud that is Crime Proceeds of a Criminal Trial Fraud. The Contempt Fraud Remedy Hearing for Citizen Mr Pead is in Norwich Crown Court on Friday 11th October 2019. The Corrupt Officers needed an Enforcement Fraud for use at the Remedy Hearing. They used an Unidentified Criminal Case Pretence Fraud + £5,529.50 Fine Default and Costs Pretence Fraud + Mastons Reference 9338481 for Reference Good Recovery Enforcement Fraud to enable use of the remedy hearing for a Sentence Breach Enforcement Fraud. They are too late.  The Contempt Remedy Hearing will get either Remedy Co-operation Proof for the Hearing Judge or Remedy Denial Fraud Proof against the Judge

Corruption Proof against Central London County Court helped to get the Surprise General Election and a Long Session of 2 ½ years for Remedy management. Central London County Court managed the Lodger Eviction Court Frauds against Citizen Mr Zarb during the Long Session.  He is a Devout Roman Catholic with a Naive Personality. He used the Corruption Proof against London Judges for a Trial Fraud Appeal QA 2018 0239 to the High Court and an Appeal Case Transfer Application to Leicester County Court. It infuriated Top Judges. They made Ruin Fraud Demands and got a Harassment Crime Framing Fraud against him. It used an Allegedly 14 Year Old Girl for a School Research Conversation + Young Adult Impersonation Fraud against Citizen Mr Zarb. She gave him a Contact Number and used the 3rd Contact for a Harassment Complaint Fraud. On 18th September 2019 the Appeal Requirement Breach Sanction Relief Applications hearing in Royal Court 37 got Costs Fraud Proof against the Claim Lawyers and High Court Justice Mr Jacobs.  The equity lawyer has not had time to visit Leicester and examine all the Case Records. He has enough for the Contempt Special Enquiry Proposals  

Equity Lawyer Mr Edward William Ellis

2019-10-09-Remedy-Process-Judicial-Office-Unfitness-Cases-Restraint-Breach-Trail-Fraud-2018-0417-Contempt-Investigation-Enquiries-for-Citizen-Mr-Pead-v-State

2019-10-10-Remedy-Process-Office-Unfitness-Cases-Lodger-Eviction-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-QB-2018-0239-Grounds-Proposals-Skeleton-of-Citizen-Mr-Zarb-v-Ms-Naluyima

Remedy Process, Office Unfitness Cases and Election Fairness Mattress Frauds

Prime Minister, Attorney General, Opposition Leader and All MPs,

The Dictator Plan used Perverse Priority for Bias Frauds to replace the Just Priority. The function of the Bias Frauds was to isolate the individual. The function of the Justice Priority was to empower the Citizen. The Dictator Dismantling Plan uses a Priority Reversal for the Justice Priority against the Bias Frauds. It is very simple. It is Jurisdiction Superiority for the Justice Priority Obligation against Legislation + Regulation + Precedent + Practice. There are Instinctual Personality Types who can service the Dictator Dismantling Plan and achieve Rapid Success. Dictator Governance relied on suppression of Instinctual Personality Types and used Trainable Personalities as Bias Fraud Enforcers. They were incapable of adapting to circumstances. Things went wrong. They blamed others. Organised Crime had Total Control. The Remedy Process has worked very well. Dictator Governors used Secret Corrupt Processes and Open Nothing Happening Pretence Processes. They used Media Broadcasts of Scripted Interviews for Management Credibility and got Progressive Incredibility. Audiences listened and viewed to know what was happening. Some stopped. Some continued to listen and view as Incredibility Monitors. Some of the Recent Broadcasts demonstrated a Confidence Deficit of MPs when challenged with Unscripted Interviews. The Unscripted Anxiety was Credible Broadcasting of Incredible Governance.  The Political Polls are Misinformation Tools for Perverse Policies. Insecure Dictators might think they need a 10,000 Tazer Policy. The People do not. An example of what they need is a Corruption Remedy Policy that takes out the Top Corrupt Officers who manage Drug Supplies to Gang Leaders. It needs to be co-ordinated with a Leadership Replacement for Gang Followers. The Equity Lawyer has Leadership Replacement Proposals. He needs Credible Remedy Commitment from the Political Party Leaders to disclose them.       

Continue reading

Remedy Process, Judicial Office Unfitness Cases, Restraint Breach Contempt and Election Fairness Case Email for Citizen Mr Pead v State

Prime Minister, Attorney General, Opposition Leader and All MPs,

Remedy Process Emails get Bounce Messages from some MPs. The Speaker will please ensure All MPs get it.

The Ultimate Sanction needs a Validity Proof Set and a Publicity Proof Set. The Validity Proof Set is everything the Corruption Remedy Process has got since revival of the Equity Monarchy Trusts in October 2004. The Publicity Proof Set is a Simple Current Proof Set that every Voter can understand. It is Corruption Proof and Remedy Denial Fraud Proof and Election Fraud Proof got from Live Cases.

The Lead Civil Cases are the Nuisance Trial Fraud + Appeals QA 29019 000205 + 000265. The Fraud Appeals forced the choice between Fraud Remedies and Fraud Enforcement. High Court Judges chose Fraud Enforcement.  The QA 2019 000205 Appeal Permission Refusal dated 24th September 2019 purports to have been made by Sir Alistair Geoffrey is a Corruption Remedy Denial Fraud. MPs have a duty to discover whether it is Genuine or Forged, and in either event to manage Corruption Remedies.

Continue reading