Equity Governance

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers, Law Court Judges and Organised Criminals

Contempt and Terrorism Penalty Warning in the event of a Response Failure to the attached 2020 000286 Immunity Negotiation Offer dated 11^th January 2021 is from the Equity Lawyer to the Owners and Directors of Eatsnow Estates Limited. At 18.20 on 12^th January 2021, Citizens Mr Hastunc and Mr Can Say effected Personal Service of it by delivery to Mr Deiz Beyzhet at Gokyuzu Restaurant, The Fairways, Southend Road, Chingford, London, E4 8TA because the Landlord owned it and had Office Space. Later it got a Service Delivery from Gokyuzu Restaurant who denied having any Service Receipt Obligation to the Landlord.

On 18^th January 2021 there was Repeat Telephone Contact from the Landlord that make Repeat Possession Demand Frauds rely on Possession Order Service Denial Frauds by the County Court. The Landlord did not admit knowledge of the Immunity Negotiation Offer. The Citizen Tenant referred the Landlord to the Landlord’s Lawyers.

All of it is Relevant Evidence and New Corruption Evidence for the New Evidence Case Reopening Applications of the Equity Lawyer in the High Court and Court of Appeal.

The Protection Fraud Market starts with the Absolute Advantage of Business Refusal Powers for Suppliers against Customers. Sometimes, Repeat Business creates enough Transaction Proof that get a Business Refusal Power Loss for the Customer against the Provider. Sometimes, Protection Fraud Providers procure Violent Crime Services or Money Laundering Services from Customers that creates enough Transaction Proof to get a Business Refusal Power Loss.

The Remedy Process forced Organised Criminals and State Officers to demand Protection Frauds that cannot get Protection Refusals by Top Judges. The Worst Risk in the Protection Fraud Market is the Immunity Risk. Immunity Deal Risk was the Worst Risk for them. It is Immunity Deals for Organised Criminals and State Officers in exchange for Remedy Co-operation and Full Disclosure that gets Corruption Proof against Top Judges. The Protection Fraud Market deals with it by requiring Fraud Commitment Proof from Fraud Beneficiaries before the Protection Fraud Supply. Sometimes the Protection Fraud deal requires Protection Fraud Proof from a Lower Court to give confidence to provide the Fraud Commitment Proof needed to get the Protection Fraud Supply from the Higher Court.

Repeat Protection Fraud Business or Crime Services, or both, got Business Refusal Power Loss for the Owners and Directors of Eatsnow Estates Limited against Top Judges.

The Lease Claim Fraud F02ED793 got Criminal Conspiracy Proof for Citizen Mr Hastunc, Parliament and the Crown against the Owners and Directors of Eatsnow Estates Limited as Organised Criminals, Black Graff LLP as Legal Representatives and Law Court Judges. It includes Defence and Counterclaim Filing Denial Frauds, Costs, Trial Directions Appeal Filing Denial Frauds, Possession Denial Appeal Hearing Notice Denial Frauds, Possession Denial Appeal Hearing Denial Fraud and Possession Denial Appeal Hearing Result Service Denial Fraud that is an Appeal Sabotage Fraud. A Possession Fraud Enforcement Bluff by the Landlord failed to get a Possession Surrender from Citizen tenant Mr Hastunc.

On Thursday 7^th January 2021 a Telephone Call from Black Graff LLP that gave Oral Notice of the Alleged Possession Order and a Vacant Possession Demand.

On Monday 11^th January 2021 a Telephone Call and then at 13.14 a Text Message from 07983537172 for Eatsnow Estates Limited Director Mr Brendon to Citizen Mr Hastunc reads, “Eddie good to talk today The court ordered you move out within 14 days Pay outstanding rent £ 85720 costs of £10048.80 and £107.30 a day if not vacated. When you move out give the keys to John in The Container storage Give me a call and we can discuss settlement”.

On Monday 19th January 2021 the Citizen Tenant had the Repeat Telephone Contact from the Landlord.

It is Corruption Damage Proof for Lease Claim F02ED793 Defence Case of Citizen Mr Hastunc. It is New Fraud Proof for the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Liability Finding Revocation, Retrial, Case Dismissal and Contempt Fraud Liability Application and the 5 Fraud Appeals of Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis.

The Equity Lawyer will apply for an F02ED793 Court File Production Order against the Ministry of Justice.

The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 got 4 Preliminary Issue Fraud Appeals and a Liability Trial Fraud Appeal. On Monday 11^th January 2021 the 1^st Fraud Appeal Dismissal Fraud by Court Officers was used to get Fraud Responsibility Proof against Appeal Lord Justice Coulson.

The Equity Lawyer will use New Corruption Proof, including the Fraud Proof against Lord Justice Coulson, as New Corruption Proof for a 2020 000286 Contempt Liability Finding Revocation, Case Dismissal, Contempt Fraud Liability Order and Contempt Fraud Remedy Application against the Solicitor General.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2021-01-11-Claim-2020-000286-Fraud-Appeals-2021-PI-10036-Bias-Fraud-F02ED793-Immunity-Negotiation-Offer-to-Eatsnow-Estates-Limited-Service-Time-by-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Officers, and Law Court Judges

UK Judges need to know that the Corruption Remedy Process got Remedy Co-operation from USA Presidents Mr Obama and Mr Trump and is likely to get it from President Mr Biden.

The Best Advice for USA President Mr Biden is to use the Inauguration Event to start a Unification Debate, follow it up with Justice Commitments and the First 100 Days to deliver Justice Credibility Successes.

Speech Suggestions and Management Suggestions

Speech Suggestions

1. Declare that he will take a political Risk
2. Explain that the Political Risk is not starting Unification Debate but setting a High Intellectual Standard
3. Explain that everyone can share the High Intellectual Standard provided they give it time and care
4. Explain that Revolution Successes get Constitutional Arrangements that benefit the Revolution Victors
5. Explain that the Glorious Revolution in 17^th Century Britain and the American War of Independence and the French Revolution in the 18^th Century got Constitutional Arrangements that benefitted the Revolution Victors
6. Explain that it is time to examine how far the Constitutional Arrangements made in the 17^th and 18^th Centuries, and the Constitutional Amendments made in the 19^th and 20^th Centuries service the Justice Priority Obligation in the 21^st Century
   
   1. The Glorious Revolution was to control the Dictator Mindset of a King that was a Civil War Risk for the 2^nd Time in a 50 Year Period. It was a Revolution Success for Equity Lawyers. They wanted Stable Government. They made Constitutional Arrangements that gave Dominant Status to the Citizen that is subject to High Standard Controls. They managed it very cleverly. They vested Parliament Session Powers in the Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops. They used Jurisdiction Separation to vest Corruption Investigation Jurisdiction in the Citizen, Prosecution Jurisdiction in the Crown and Adjudication Jurisdiction in the Lord Bishops. They used 24 Lord Bishops so that up to 12 of them sit as Trial Jurors and up to 12 others sit as Appeal Jurors. They used the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard as a Quality Control. It is Official Records that are Justice Proof for Honourable Officers or Guilt Proof against Corrupt Officers and Credibility Irrelevance Proof for the Victim. It eliminates the need for Witness Attendances and Credibility Findings. It gives confidence that Trial Orders by the Crown will get Rapid Processing. It vested Citizen Accountability Powers in anyone who has the Intellectual Competence and Personal Confidence for Case Management that gets Proof Sets that meet the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard. It is not an Elitist Standard. It is a Justice Standard.
   2. Citizen Empowerment got by the Glorious Revolution influenced the Independence Aspirations of the American Colonies. It motivated the American War of Independence. The Commercial Executive resourced the Colonial Forces with Money and Talent. The Constitutional Arrangements had the effect of vesting in the Commercial Executive the Accountability Powers needed to control the State Executive.
   3. The French Revolution went through a Chaotic Period. It got General Acceptance of Dictator Governance by the Commercial Executive. The Constitutional Arrangements of the Code Napoleon enabled the Commercial Executive to provide Economic Support for Dictator Governance and denied Accountability Powers that Journalists, Politicians and Lawyers needed to stop the use of the Dictator Governance for Napoleonic Wars.
   4. The European Constitution was based on the Napoleonic Code. It vested Dictator Powers in the State. It got Constitutional Acceptance by Many Governors, Constitutional Rejection from Many Voters and an Enormous Rift between Governors and Governed.
   5. The European Constitution got Referenda Rejection by the French, Dutch, Irish and British. It did not get Constitutional Change for the French, Dutch and Irish. It did get Sovereign Independence for the British.
7. The United States has Similar Divisions to those in the European Union.
8. It is time for a Unification Debate.
9. It is time to consider the need for Citizen Empowerment will Performance Quality Controls.
10. This is not a Political Issue between Political Parties. It is a Governance Issue between Governors and Governed. It needs everyone to invest time and care achieving the High Intellectual Standard the Unification Issue deserves.

Management Suggestions

1. Make the Unification Speech using the Remedy Proposal for Citizen Empowerment subject to Performance Quality Controls is a Remedy Proposal by the President that challenges everyone else to make Debate Contributions
2. Get Media Publicity for Constitutional Change Conflicts in Other Sovereign States  
3. Get Media Publicity for an Indian Constitutional Change Enquiry of the Indian President whether the Indian Law Commission made Constitutional Recommendations for Death Inquest Powers for Out of State Deaths and if so when and the progress made by the Indian Parliament
4. Get Media Publicity for what the USA can learn from the Case Management of Constitutional Conflicts
5. Get Media Publicity for Cross Party Collaboration by Senators and Representatives that addresses the Performance Quality Control and silences the Extremists
6. Get Justice Credibility Proof within the First 100 Days

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Officers, Law Court Judges and Law Court Judges

Contempt Fraud Complaint against the House of Commons Speaker

The Parliament Contempt Remedy Jurisdiction and the Session Hearing Jurisdiction get Justice Office Status and the Uncontested Seat Electoral Convention for the House of Commons Speaker. Royal Commission Emails to House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <Lindsay.hoyle.mp@parliament.uk> got Automatic Replies that claimed a Political Representation Jurisdiction for Constituents Only and referred All Others to the Email Address <speakersoffice@parliament.uk>. The Remedy Responsibility Acknowledgement Failure is Contempt Fraud Proof for the Citizen, Parliament, Crown and People against the House of Commons Speaker.

Contempt Fraud Complaint against the Royal Courts Fee Office and the Court of Appeal

1. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Filing Acknowledgement 43 Day Delay Fraud, Conflict Disqualification Denial Contempt Fraud, Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit Denial Contempt Fraud, Master Identity Non-Disclosure Contempt Fraud, Appellant Notice Deficit Pretence Fraud and Repeat Filing Requirement Fraud
   
   The Recusal Refusal Fraud and Trial Fraud Appeal got a 43 Day Filing Acknowledgement Denial Fraud from the Sign For Post NY022186103GB Receipt on 24^th November 2020 until the Acknowledgment + Reference 2021 PI 10063 Notice Email at 16.08 on 7^th January 2021 from Administrative Officer Mr Peter Coburn that read
   
   ‘I acknowledge receipt of your papers, which this office received on 24.11.20. Your papers were referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you of the following: “If Mr Ellis is seeking to appeal an order in addition to the order of 3.11.20 he must file an appellant’s notice clearly showing the date of the order in section 2 and a copy of the order being appealed. The appellant notice in relation to the order of 3.11.20 will be issued.” Please quote 2021/PI/10063 in correspondence.’
   
   It is an Appellant Notice Deficit Pretence Fraud and Repeat Filing Requirement Fraud because the Appellant Notice disclosed in section 2 the Judge Identity of Justice Mr Jay and the Order Date of 3^rd November 2020
   
2. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Conflict Disqualification Denial Contempt Fraud, Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit Denial Contempt Fraud, Master Identity Non-Disclosure Fraud, Attempted Withdrawal Procurement Fraud and Response 7 Day Time Limit Fraud
   
   The Recusal Refusal Fraud and Trial Fraud Appeal Attempted Withdrawal Procurement Fraud Email at 14.57 on 8^th January 2021 from Court of Appeal Officer Mr Yomi Oba that read
   
   Dear Sir/Madam, I acknowledge receipt of your papers, which this office received on 24.11.20 Your papers were referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you of the following: “Please confirm whether you still wish to pursue an application for permission to appeal from the order of Jay J dated 3/11/20 refusing to recuse himself. Jay J reconsidered his decision and the order of 9/11/20 confirms that Jay J did recuse himself.  An appeal from the order of 3/11/20, therefore, appears to be academic” You have 7 days from the date on this letter to reply. Please quote 2021/PI/10063 in correspondence.
   
   The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops managed a Corruption Remedy Process. It needed Corruption Investigations of the Law Courts using Investigation Services by Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis. Corrupt Officers lost confidence. They demanded Protection Frauds from Top Judges. They tried to defend themselves with Computer Record Frauds that were Case Misrepresentation Frauds and Identity Misrepresentation Frauds for Corrupt Officers, Corrupt Representatives and Corrupt Judges. It created the need for Audio Records that are Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals or Hearing Denial Fraud Proof that is Audio record Denial Proof. The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 was the lead Case for getting Audio Records.
   
   The Worst Risk in the Protection Fraud Market is that Corrupt Officers trade Remedy Co-operation that gets Protection Fraud Proof against Suppliers in exchange for Immunity Terms. Top Judges control the Immunity Risk by requiring Fraud Beneficiaries to provide Fraud Commitment Proof before the Protection Fraud Supply. The State Officers, State Counsel and Trial Judges demanded the Fraud Commitment Proof of Appeal Process Denial Frauds by the Court of Appeal before delivering the Prosecution Frauds. The Court of Appeal demanded Fraud Commitment Proof from Protection Fraud Beneficiaries before delivery of the Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 Dismissal Fraud. The Fraud Commitment Proof they got from Lower Court Judges was Case Frauds against Citizens who serviced the Remedy Process. The Fraud Commitment Proof they got from Sussex Police was a Sex Crime Investigation Fraud against Citizen Mr Taylor who had serviced the Remedy Process.
   
   The Remedy Process needed the Audio Records and Decision Proof before procuring the Forced Recusal. It got the Forced Recusal and Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud for the Trial Directions that were the Crime Proceeds of the Recusal Refusal Fraud.
   
3. The Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Frauds on 14^th, 16^th and 18^th December 2020 by Trial Judge Mrs Cutts got the 5^th Fraud Appeal, Bundle Filing Email on 21^st December 2020 by the Equity Lawyer and Automatic Acknowledgement Emails from the Court of Appeal and Appeal Process Denial Fraud Proof for the Equity Lawyer against the Court of Appeal    
   
4. Fraud Appeal Fee Remission Process Denial Frauds by Fee Officers
   
   The Royal Commission, 5 Trial Fraud Appeal and Fraud Appeals x 5 Bundle Filing Email on 21^st December 2020 got the Automatic Response Emails from the Court of Appeal and the Fees Office using Fees (RCJ) at 17 02 on 22nd December 2020 that reads, ‘Thank you for your email. If your query is in relation to Help With Fees, please ensure you have provided your HWF reference, a copy of the document you are applying for Help with Fees for, which Division the application is for and the court fee you would be paying. Any request that does not comply with this will not be processed. For other Fees queries, we aim to respond within to emails within 3-5 working days.’
   
   The 5^th Fraud Appeal got No Further Response from the Fees Office and No Substantive Filing Acknowledgement by the Court of Appeal.
   
   The Royal Commission Email on 6^th January 2021 made Remedy Proposals and gave Reasons that explained the Protection Fraud Criminal Conspiracy by Top Judges. It got the Irrelevance Notice Response Email at 09.39 on 7^th January 2021 from Fee Administration Officer Mr Stuart Dabbs that reads ‘Dear Sirs, Upon checking the contents of this email I am unable to find anything that would explain why it has been sent to the fees office. Unless you have specific requests of the fees office please refrain from sending us emails that do not concern us.’
   
   A Contempt Fraud Investigation is needed to discover whether Fee Officers received Process Denial Fraud Orders and that the True Intent of the Irrelevance Notice Response Email was a Process Acknowledgment that they dare not make in any other way

Special Request for Fee Remission Services for the 5^th Fraud Appeal

Remedy Proposal for

1. Restraint Renewal Fraud Appeal 2020 0396 Dismissal Contempt Fraud Admissions, Contempt Fraud Dismissal Revocation, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order ad Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Directions 1 Hour Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
2. Restraint Breach Prosecution Permission Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 Dismissal Fraud Contempt Admissions, Contempt Fraud Dismissal Revocation Decisions, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Remedy 1 Hour Hearing Order for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
3. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Start Fraud, Trial Adjournment Directions Fraud dated 3^rd November 2019 Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Filing Acknowledgment 43 Day Delay Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
4. Recusal, Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud dated 9^th November 2019 Appeal Filing Acknowledgment 43 Day Delay Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
5. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Frauds dated 14^th and 16^th and 18^th December 2020 Appeal Filing Acknowledgment Denial Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General

Without Prejudice to Invalidity Arguments Repeat Filing of the Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Directions Fraud Appellant Notice and Recusal Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud Appellant Notice 

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-11-16-Contempt-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-2020-XXXX-Recusal-Refusal-Trial-Directions-Fraud-Appellant-Notice-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General-n161-eng

2020-11-16-Contempt-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-2020-YYYY-Recusal-Trial-Directions-Confirmation-Fraud-Appellant-Notice-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General-n161-eng-

The Judicial Unfitness Complaint Investigators will please check with Citizen Mr Nkrumah whether he used the Attached Documents as written or After Amendment.

The Judicial Misconduct Complaint 33439 20 is that a Justice Perversion Criminal Conspiracy by Organised Criminals, State Officers, Representatives, and Supervising Judges, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges of the County Court, Magistrates Court, Crown Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court used a Prison Licence Forgery for Investigation Frauds, Prosecution Frauds, Trial Frauds, Appeal Frauds and Computer Record Frauds that are Case Misrepresentation Frauds and Identity Misrepresentation Frauds for Corrupt Officers and Corrupt Judges that have resulted in Fraud Appeal 2020 0055 that got Protection Fraud Proof against the Supreme Court and resulted in the Judicial Complaint for the Prison Licence Breach Trial Frauds and Contempt Remedy Application Hearing Denial Frauds in the Magistrates Court on 9^th September 2020 by whoever used the Alleged Identity of District Judge McIvor and Court Officers for:   

1. Intimidation Frauds against Citizen Defendant Mr Nkrumah that day
2. Intimidation Public Gallery Witnesses including Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis that day
3. Trial Frauds against Citizen Defendant Mr Nkrumah that day
4. Costs and Contempt Remedy Application Hearing Frauds against Citizen Mr Nkrumah that day
5. Case Papers Theft from Citizen Mr Nkrumah fate he left the Magistrates Court that day
6. Case Papers Theft Investigation Denial Fraud by the Metropolitan Police that day and thereafter
7. Repeat Contempt Remedy Application Process Denial Frauds that day and thereafter
8. Costs and Contempt Remedy Denial Fraud Appeal Process Denial Frauds by the Crown Court
9. Protection Frauds before and after the Complaint Event for Liable Parties against Citizen Mr Nkrumah by All Law Courts including the Supreme Court

Equity lawyer Mr Ellis assisted Citizen Mr Nkrumah by producing:

1. Royal Commission and Sentence Breach Framing Fraud 012000266764 Appeal Grounds dated 11^th September 2020  
2. Royal Commission, Sentence Breach Framing Fraud 012000266764 REPEAT Wasted Costs and REPEAT Contempt Fraud Remedy Application of Citizen Mr Nkrumah

The Judicial Misconduct Complaint 33439 20 got a Comment Request and 21 Day Response Time Limit Emails at 15.17 and 15.28  on 6^th January 2021 from Judicial Office Misconduct Complaint Case Worker Ms Dina El Adlani respectively to Citizen Ms Berry and Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis.

Criminal Conspiracies for Court Frauds by Ministry of Justice Officers that are evidenced by Judicial Misconduct are Conflict Disqualifications against Corruption Investigations controlled by the Ministry of Justice.

The Comment Request ignored Case Documents including the Appeal Grounds and Repeat Applications. It raised Reasonable Suspicions of Evidence Exclusion Frauds by Magistrates Court Officers or Complaint Investigators.

Conflict Disqualification Remedy Proposal by the Equity Lawyer that the Complaint Investigators make a Conflict Disqualification Admission and Case Reference to the Secretary of State for Justice that enables a Case Reference to the House of Commons Speaker for the Stated Reason that:

The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 got Fraud Appeals 2020 0396 + 2069 and 3 Other Fraud Appeals. All of them got Criminal Conspiracy Proof against Organised Criminals, State Officers, Legal Representatives and Law Court Supervising Judges, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges. The Criminal Conspiracy Proof meets the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard. All of it was got for Unfitness Cases, Corruption Finding, and Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges in Parliament.

The Parliament Session Agreement dated December 2019 between the Crown and Prime Minister contained a Corruption Remedy Condition required that a Royal Commission get Corruption Remedies before the Session End. The Default Penalty is a Parliament Session Refusal and Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof and Remedy Denial Fraud Proof.

Performance of the Remedy Condition needed Equity Lawyers to recruit Citizens and provide Case Management and get Criminal Conspiracy Proof that meets the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard.

Equity Lawyer Mr Edward William Ellis recruited Citizens and provided the Case Management and got Criminal Conspiracy Proof in the Parliamentary Session that met the Remedy Proof Standard.

Criminal Conspiracy Proof created before and after the Parliament Session Agreement motivated Corrupt Officers to demand Protection Frauds from Top Judges and try to defend themselves using Computer Record Frauds to get Case Misrepresentation Frauds and Identity Concealment Frauds for Corrupt Officers, Corrupt Representatives and Corrupt Judges

The Computer Record Frauds created the need Audio Records that are Conflict Qualification Fraud Proof + Bias Fraud Proof + Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof + Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals and or Hearing Denial Fraud Proof that is Audio Record Denial Fraud Proof + Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof that, in any event, is for the Citizen, Honourable Parliamentarians, Lord Bishops and Crown against Organised Criminals, State Officers, Representatives, Law Court Supervising Judges, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges.

Citizen Cases that got Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof got Royal Commission Case Status.

The Divorce ZC14D02308 Property Fraud Remedy Applications and the Wardship Claim FD20P00642 and the Child Care Release Claim ZW20C00422 got Hearing Audio Records that are Fraud Proof for the 6 Theodorou Children, Citizen Mother Mrs Theodorou, Parliament and Crown against the Organised Criminal Father, Organised Criminal Eldest Child, Case Representatives, State Officers, Law Court Supervising Judges, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges.

The Housing Tenancy Possession Fraud, Criminal Trial Frauds, Prison Release Habeas Corpus Claims, Criminal Appeals, Prison Licence Breach Sentence Enforcement Claim, Corruption Claims and Corruption Appeal 2020 0055 got Unrecorded Hearing Fraud Proof and Hearing Denial Fraud Proof that is Forgery Proof, Perjury Proof, Trial Fraud Proof, Appeal Fraud Proof, Computer Record Fraud Proof, Conflict Qualification Fraud Proof, Bias Fraud Proof and Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof that includes for Citizen Mr Nkrumah, Parliament and the Crown against Organised Criminals, State Officers, Representatives, Law Court Supervising Judges, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges in the County Court, Magistrates Court, Crown Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

The Shop Theft Claims 2019 003741, 003984 got Hearing Denial Fraud Proof, Decision Proof Service Denial Fraud Proof and Protection Fraud Proof for Citizen Mr Nkrumah, Parliament and the Crown against Organised Criminals, Metropolitan Police Officers, Other State Officers, Representatives, Supervising Judges, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges in the High Court all of which is Protection Fraud Proof against the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

The Lease Claim Fraud F02ED793 got both Hearing Audio Record Proof and Hearing Denial Fraud Proof and Protection Fraud Proof for Citizen Mr Hastunc, Parliament and the Crown against the Organised Criminal Landlords Eatsnow Estates Limited, Representatives Black Graff LLP, State Officers, Supervising Judges, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges of the County Court and Protection Fraud Proof against the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

The Family Trust Claim B01B0837 and Mortgage Possession Claim F01PP7696 got both Hearing Audio Record Proof and Hearing Denial Fraud Proof and Protection Fraud Proof for Citizen Father Mr Sood, Parliament and the Crown against the Organised Criminal Trustee Son Mr Sood, Representatives, State Officers, Supervising Judges, Trial Judges and Appeal Judges of the County Court and Protection Fraud Proof against the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

The Executorship Renunciation Claim 2020 000207 got both Hearing Audio Records, Other Case Records that are Forgery Proof, Perjury Proof, Trial Fraud Proof, Computer Record Fraud Proof, Conflict Qualification Fraud Proof, Bias Fraud Proof and Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof for the Harpal Kaur Probate Trust Beneficiaries, Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis, Parliament and the Crown against an Organised Criminal USA Banker, State Officers, Representatives, Law Court Supervising Judges and Trial Judges in the High Court Chancery Division and Protection Fraud Proof against the High Appeal Queen’s Bench Division, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 got Fraud Appeals 2020 0396 and 2069 and 3 Other Fraud Appeals got both Hearing Audio Records, Other Case Records that are Forgery Proof, Perjury Proof, Trial Fraud Proof, Computer Record Fraud Proof, Justice Perversion Proof, Conflict Qualification Fraud Proof, Bias Fraud Proof and Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof for Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis, Parliament and the Crown against Organised Criminals, State Officers, Representatives, Law Court Supervising Judges and Trial Judges in the High Court and Appeal Fraud Proof and Protection Fraud Proof against the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

Free Markets have Risk Protocols. They require Transaction Commitment Proof and Full Disclosure by the Transferor to the Transferee. The Worst Risk in the Protection Fraud Market is that Immunity Deals get Full Disclosure and Remedy Co-operation from Corrupt Officers that get Protection Fraud Proof against Top Judges. The Protection Fraud Risk Protocols control the Immunity Risk by requiring Fraud Commitment Proof from the Fraud Beneficiary before the Protection Fraud Supply.

Investigation is needed to discover how many more Citizen Cases have Royal Commission Status.

Top Judges knew all of the Royal Commission Cases. They imposed a Protection Fraud Condition that Corrupt Officers use Royal Commission Cases to provide Fraud Commitment Proof before getting Protection Frauds.

The function of the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 was to get Restraint Frauds and Restraint Breach Imprisonment Frauds against the Equity Lawyer to prevent him providing Remedy Case Management for Citizens against the Case Frauds that Corrupt Officers committed to provide Commitment Proof.

Parliament and the Crown need Official Records that meet the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard and are Admissions Evidence and get Unfitness Cases, Corruption Findings and Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges. The most efficient method for doing so is to produce to use Fact Recitals and Appropriate Remedies in a Draft Order and refer to it in a Remedy Application Notice. The Draft Remedy order dated 9^th January 2021 serves that purpose. The Remedy Proposals it makes are:

1. Contempt Claim 2020 000286 Finding, Defence Case Finding, Restraint Renewal Fraud Appeal Fraud Appeal 2020 0396 Finding, Pending Appeal Trial Stay Protection Breach Contempt Fraud and Imprisonment Committal Application Permission Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 Finding, Pending Appeal Trial Stay Protection Breach Contempt Fraud and Recusal Refusal Fraud and Trial Fraud and Adjourned Trial Directions Frauds by Trial Judge Mr Jay Appeal and Filed Appeal Acknowledgement Denial Fraud Finding, Pending Appeal Adjudication Trial Stay Protection Breach Contempt Fraud Appeal and After Recusal Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud by Trial Judge Mr Jay Appeal and Filed Appeal Acknowledgement Denial Fraud Finding, Pending Appeal Trial Stay Protection Breach Contempt Fraud and Recusal Refusal Fraud and Liability Trial Fraud and Trial Directions Frauds by Trial Judge Mrs Cutts Appeal and Filed Appeal Acknowledgement Denial Fraud Finding, Protection Fraud Agreement Conspiracy between Organised Criminals and Legal Representatives and State Officers and County Court Judges and High Court Judges and Court of Appeal Judges Finding, Fraud Commitment Proof Condition and County Court Mortgage Claim F1PP7696 Repayment Mortgage Valuation Access Application Listing Denial Fraud and Mortgage Repayment Denial Fraud by Bank of Scotland and Before Protection Event Condition and Condition Performance Finding, Lease Claim F02ED793 Without Due Process Possession Fraud by Landlords Eatsnow Estates Limited and the County Court against Citizen Mr Hastunc and Before Protection Event Commitment Proof Condition and Condition Performance Finding, Contempt 2020 000286 Liability Trial Fraud by the State and High Court against Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis Before Event Commitment Proof Condition and Condition Performance Finding, Sex Crime Investigation Fraud by Sussex Police against Citizen Mr Taylor Before Protection Event Condition and Condition Performance Finding, Fraud Appeal 2069 Dismissal Fraud and Protection Fraud Finding, Justice Perversion Finding, Conspiracy Finding, Contempt Fraud Finding, Remedy Entitlement Finding, 2020 000286 Contempt Liability Finding Revocation, Contempt Liability Finding, Special and General and Aggravated and Exemplary Damages Order, £2,000,000 Interim Damages Immediate Payment Order and Remedy Trial Directions 1 Hour Hearing Order at 2 p.m. on             January 2021 for Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis against the Solicitor General.
2. Liability Party Status Order for the Equity Lawyer against the Ministry of Justice.
3. Pending Adjudication All Cases Enforcement Stay Protection Order, Court Record Production Orders, Contempt and Terrorism Penalty Warning for the equity Lawyer and All Citizen Witnesses against All State Offices and the Ministry of Justice.
4. Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286, Fraud Appeal 2020 0396, 2069 and 3 Other Fraud Appeals Case Papers Use Permit for Remedy Applications in All Cases by All Citizens against All Others.
5. Further discovery, enquiry, relief and remedy the cause of justice needs.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2021-01-09-Royal-Commission-2020-000286-Fraud-Appeals-DRAFT-REMEDY-ORDER-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-09-24-Royal-Commission-Justice-Perversion-Treason-Conspiracy-Criminal-Complaint-Statement-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah-v-State

2020-09-12-Royal-Commission-Theft-2822049-2020-Additional-Evidence-Notice-and-Investigation-Demand-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah

2020-09-11-Royal-Commission-Sentence-Breach-Framing-Fraud-012000266764-Contempt-Remedy-Application-Hearing-Denial-Fraud-Appeal-Grounds-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah-v-State

2020-08-27-Royal-Commission-Framing-Fraud-012000266764-Contempt-Remedy-Application-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah-v-State

2020-03-17-Royal-Commission-Case-Habeas-Corpus-and-Case-Stated-Fraud-Review-CO-610-2020-Appeal-Grounds-stamp-x-1-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah-v-State

2020-03-05-Royal-Commission-Case-Habeas-Corpus-Fraud-Appeal-Grounds-Proposals-of-Citizen-Ast-Nkrumah-v-Prime-Minister-Others

2020-02-18-Royal-Commission-Case-Notice-Housing-Theft-Claim-QB-2020-000534-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah-v-London-and-Quadrant-Housng-Trust

2020-02-18-Corruption-Claim-QB-2020-000534-Claim-Particulars-stamp-x-2-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah-v-State

2020-02-18-Corruption-Claim-QB-2020-000534-Framing-Fraud-012000266764-Sentence-Enforcement-Fraud-Hearing-on-19th-February-2020-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah-v-State

2020-09-16-Royal-Commission-012000266764-Wasted-Costs-Contempt-Remedy-Application-Grounds-of-Citizen-Mr-Nkrumah-v-State

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

On 7^th January 2021 a Telephone Call from the Landlord Lawyers gave Citizen Mr Hastunc that a Lease Claim F02ED793 Secret Possession Hearing had got a Possession Order and a Vacant Possession Demand.

Citizen Mr Hastunc agreed to make a New Corruption Evidence Witness Statement for Remedy Applications by the Equity Lawyer in the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 and the Fraud Appeals.

Citizen Mr Hastunc is a Talented Chef but Almost Illiterate.  The Corruption Remedy Process made progress that motivated Corrupt Officers to demand Protection Frauds from Top Judges. The Worst Risk in the Protection Fraud Market was that Protection Procurers trade Corruption Investigation Co-operation that gets Protection Fraud Proof against Providers in exchange for Immunity Terms. They control the Investigation Risk by imposing Fraud Commitment Proof from the Fraud Procurer before the Protection Fraud Supply.

The Contempt 2020 000286 Restraint Frauds are intended to prevent the Equity Lawyer providing Case Management for Corruption Victims including Citizen Mr Hastunc. The Restraint Frauds cannot prevent the production of New Evidence Notices and Witness Statements that explain the Remedy Applications they support. The Corruption Victims can use the Witness Statements to support Remedy Applications in their own cases. The Restraint Frauds are intended to prevent Case Management by the Equity Lawyer but cannot prevent Witness Statements and Witness Testimony by the Corruption Victims

Citizen Mr Hastunc relies on Interpretation Services from Citizen Mr Hastunc. He understands the music of the English Language but sometimes makes Technical Errors. He does the best he can.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2021-01-08-Royal-Commission-New-Evidence-Witness-Statement-of-Citizen-Mr-Hastunc-for-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Officers and Law Court Judges,

Unconditional Grateful Thanks to the Queen, Prince of Wales, Lord Archbishops, Lord Bishops, Honourable Parliamentarians and Citizens who enabled the Remedy Process to reach this stage.  

Conditional Grateful Thanks to the BBC for the program ‘Ian Hyslop Fake News’ on 5^th January 2021 subject to the condition that the True Intent was Remedy Management and not Cynical Profiteering.

Remedy Proposals:

1. All Mass Media service the Remedy Process by acknowledging the Root Problem is the substitution of the Justice Priority Obligation that needs Reliable Objectivity for Effective Accountability with the Self-Indulgent Bias Priority using Unaccountable Empowerment that has Injustice Risks and Injustice Inevitability
2. Parliament service the Remedy Process
   1. Acknowledge the Jurisdiction Superiority of Remedy Jurisdiction for the Citizen against Political Representation Jurisdiction for the Constituent
   2. All MPs change their web sites by removal of the Political Representations Only Propaganda and insertion of
      1. the Clear Message that “MPs have Dual Jurisdiction of Corruption Remedy Jurisdiction for the Citizen and Political Representation Jurisdiction for the Constituent and there is Jurisdiction Superiority for the Remedy Jurisdiction against the Political Representation Jurisdiction”
      2. The Clear Message that “Remedy Management uses the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard. An Equity Lawyers is anyone who knows how to provide Case Management to get Proof Sets that meet the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard. The Legal Profession used to provide a Reliable Supply of Equity Lawyers and needs time to recover the capacity to do so. MPs and the Law Professions need time to discover who can provide the services of an Equity Lawyer.”
      3. Separate Processes for Remedy Management and Political Representation Management.
   3. Use of the Remedy Jurisdiction for a Contempt 2020 000286 Liability Trial Fraud Finding and Fraud Appeals 2020 0396 and 2069 Dismissal Frauds Finding for a Protection Breach Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Finding and Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges and then Mass Remedies
   4. Acknowledge the need for Advanced Electronic Signatures provided by the Citizen to enable Personal Accountability and Remedy Management against Corruption Damage by Irresponsible Media Uses, State Officers and Law Court Judges
   5. Profiteering Penalties against Damage Injustice by Unidentifiable Sources
   6. Mass Education for the Justice Priority against the Bias Priority
   7. Mass Education for service of the Justice Priority with the Equity Processes for Truth Discovery and Just Reasoning.
   8. Mass Education for Evidence Process using Valid Presumptions subject to Rebuttal Proof
   9. Mass Education for a Positive Proof Burden and Inconsistent Positive Proof as Negative Proof   

Reasons:

1. The Citizen, Crown, Lord Bishops and Honourable Parliamentarians have managed a Corruption Remedy Process to recover control of the State and Law Courts from the Protection Fraud Network.
2. The Protection Fraud Network manages a Protection Fraud Market. It uses Free Market Protocols that require Risk Disclosure for Risk Assessment and Acceptance by a Buyer or Rejection by the Market. Special Business needs Before Event Arrangements until Market Practice define a Market Standard for Routine Business that eliminates the need for Before Event Arrangements. Everything else is Special Business. Market Changes can convert Routine Business into Special Business. Sometimes they are Surprise Events that either a Protection Fraud Execution Failure or an Offer Rejection that result in a Market Collapse and Consequential Damage.
3. The Corruption Remedy Process needed to achieve a Protection Fraud Market Collapse with Damage Limitation. It needed Case Management by the Equity Lawyer and Citizens that forced a Market Change, converted Routine Business into Special Business, got a Risk Offer by Top Judges and either an Offer Rejection or Protection Fraud Failure by Corrupt Parliamentarians, and a Market Collapse with Damage Limitation using the Justice Responsibility Acceptance by Honourable Parliamentarians.
4. The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Imprisonment Committal Trail Frauds against the Equity Lawyer got Collapse Conditions for the Remedy Process against the Protection Fraud Market. They converted Routine Business into Special Business. Corruption Controllers feared Top State Officers had made Immunity Deals in exchange for Remedy Co-operation that required them to get Corruption Proof against Top Judges.  They managed the Immunity Risk by requiring that Key State Officers provide Fraud Commitment Proof before Protection Frauds by the Court of Appeal.
5. In December 2020 Sussex Police had Key Officer Status for the purposes of the Protection Fraud Deal. They got it by hosting Drug Production for Top Police, Top Customs and Top Judges who were the Top Drug Dealers in the United Kingdom. They needed Permanent Supplies of Chemically Traceable Supplies for Career Sabotage Frauds against Honest Officers whenever needed. They needed a Drug Production Business to get the Permanent Supplies. Sussex Police hosted the Drug Production because the water was good for it. Top Judges had Manager Appointment Powers for the Drug Production Business. It was a Payment Guarantee and Control Guarantee for the Top Judges.
6. The Drug Production Business Manager and Host Officers needed Protection Frauds that would last their lifetimes. In June 2002 they thought they got it by use of Firearms Thefts by the Business Manager and Firearms Crime Protection Frauds by Sussex Police. The Theft Proof, Protection Fraud Proof was the Stolen Firearms and Receipt 233607 that identified them and the Business Manager as Possessor and the Cabinet from which they were stolen and Receipt 233608 that identified it with the comment “Locked – contents unknown” and the Armoury Audit Records.  All of it motivated Theft Discovery Delay Frauds using a Drug Production Framing Fraud between 2005 and 2007 against the Firearms Owner. In January 2009 the Firearms Theft Exposure motivated Protection Frauds thereafter by the State, Law Courts and Corrupt Parliamentarians. Career Sabotage Frauds against Honest Officers linked the Protection Frauds for everything including Medical Murders, Human Organ Thefts, Family Sabotage Frauds, Child Trafficking, Framing Frauds and Property Frauds. The Human Organ Theft Proof Set, Child Trafficking Proof Set and Firearms Corruption Proof Set were Key Evidence for the Corruption Remedy Process. In December 2020 the Protection Fraud Network was so damaged that it gave Key State Office Status to Sussex Police because they were so closely connected to Top Judges. It created Collapse Conditions for the Protection Fraud Market.
7. All that remains is for Honest Parliamentarians to trigger the Collapse Conditions.
8. The Equity Lawyer will continue to service the Remedy Process. He has a Care Duty to All Citizens and All Equity Lawyers who come after him to demand Deterrent Penalties against Law Court Judges and Corrupt Parliamentarians who service the Remedy Denial Frauds against him. The Kidney Failure Condition is an Aggravating Factor when Proportionate Deterrents.
9. The Kidney Failure Condition makes it Absolute Madness for Honourable Parliamentarians to rely on him. End Stage Kidney Failure causes a series of Toxin Dumps by the Body in the Flesh. The result is Dump Damage and Corrosion Damage. People do not notice that the Subconscious Mind controls Body Maintenance and the Conscious Mind controls Body Use until Extreme Stress causes them to discover it.  In Early 2019 a Poison Event caused the Equity Lawyer to discover it. The Subconscious managed Poison Excretion using the Sweat Glands. The Poison Molecules ruptured the Sweat Glands and did Skin Damage.  The Subconscious used Sleep Deprivation to get Remedy Co-operation by the Conscious. Eventually, the Equity Lawyer realised the Subconscious needed Scab Removal to enable Repeat Use of the Damaged Sweat Glands for Poison Excretion and thereby preserve the Undamaged Skin, did the Scab Removal and when he had done enough got a Sleep Chemical Release and Immediate Sleep. About 3 months later he suffered End Stage Kidney Failure. It created an Energy Conflict between Case Management by the Conscious Mind and Body Maintenance by the Subconscious Mind. Sleep Chemicals evidenced that the Subconscious had imposed a Sleep Condition for Healing Services. Wilful Wakefulness caused a Healing Service Loss. The Equity Lawyer was satisfied the Subconscious used Body Control to get Support Services from the Conscious. He used Exercise Test to discover whether the Conscious could get Targeted Healing from the Subconscious. It worked. The Healing Services were subject to the Sleep Condition. The result was a Significant Recovery with Consequential Damage. The Significant Recovery includes Physical Fitness that enables him to run 5 miles in an hour but a Stamina Loss that forces him to rest afterwards. The Consequential Damage includes Heat Control Loss. The Blood Cleaning Dialysis Sessions started in April 2020. The Blood Passage out of the body through the Dialysis Machine results in a Heat Loss. The Patient Mass, Process Quantity and Process Rate governs the Heat Loss. The In-Patient Sessions were in a Hospital Bed with Bed Clothes masking the Heat Loss. The Out-Patient Sessions were on Hospital Chairs with a Blanket Supply if needed. In the summer months a number of Dialysis Sessions for the 69 Kilos of the Equity Lawyer using the Process Rate of 350 millilitres a minute resulted in a Heat Loss of about 1 Degree Centigrade at the end of Hour 1 that got a Shiver Response from the Subconscious. He investigated whether the Heat Loss Trigger for the Shiver Response could be reduced by 1 Degree centigrade. He ignored the Shiver Response. It got a Suspension or Termination of the Shiver Response by the Subconscious. On the evidence available the Subconscious uses the Overcoat Removal in the Hotel Bedroom as a Dialysis Session End Signal and then releases a Cold Sensation that prompts the Equity Lawyer to get into bed fully clothed and fall asleep. On the evidence available it is for both Heat Recovery and Healing Services. Honourable Parliamentarians have Due Notice that the Equity Lawyer knows Heat Loss makes it harder for him to function but does not know the Heat Loss Risks for himself and the Remedy Process.
10. The Corona Virus Emergency denied Morning Session Dialysis Patients use of the Pout Patient Ward Waiting Area or the Ward Internal Entrance Corridor and forced them to use the External Entrance. When seated Hospital Queues Members converse with the nearest Queue Members. When standing they can face and converse with more of them. The Morning Dialysis Patients gather outside the External Entrance at 7 a.m. until they are admitted between 10 and 20 minutes later. The Waiting Events have been useful for the Equity Lawyer. He says Good Morning. He does not give Conversation Leads. He listens and gives polite responses. The Waiting Events got Free Expression that revealed the Other Dialysis Patients have medical records Access that the Equity Lawyer does not have. They make Coldness Complaints on some days but not every day. On Tuesday 4^th January 2021 the Equity Lawyer made a Remedy Proposal that they wait in a Warm Corridor until 7.15 and then appear for Immediate Admission very soon afterwards. All of them ignored it. He needs to observe how long it takes for the Remedy Proposal gets either a Positive Response or certainty they need a Renal Nurse to give a Warm Corridor Queue Instruction. The Renal Nurses know.  On 4th January 2021, the Triage Temperature for the Equity Lawyer taken on entry was 33.2 Degrees Centigrade. The Renal Nurse said he had been in the cold too long.  If the Remedy Proposal does not get a Positive Response from the Dialysis Patients, he intends to make it to the Ward Manager. All of it is Relevant Evidence for the Remedy Process.  It needs Remedy Co-operation at every level. It includes moving Dialysis Patients out of the cold into the warm without compromising Safety Management.
11. The Equity Lawyer used the Renal Ward Manger to give the NHS Hospital Trust Chief Executive and Nephrology Doctors a Medical Opinion Request and Advance Notice of the 2020 000286 Medical Records Access Repeat Application. It got Response Refusals by all of them. The Equity Lawyer intends to file the Repeat Application with the Response Refusal and Medical Articles as Support Evidence.     
12. The Best Advice for Honourable Parliamentarians is not to await the outcome of the Contempt 2020 000286 Medical Records Access Repeat Application or New Evidence Case Dismissal Application or Penalty Hearing but use the Liability Trial Proof and Appeal Dismissal Fraud as Protection Breach Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Proof for Corruption Findings and Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges and give it Mass Publicity. Then it is to motivate more than 1 billion of the Indian People and everyone else to share the Remedy Process.
13. The Body Remains of Sunaina Chaudhari are in the Delhi Morgue pending Jurisdiction Changes needed for a Death Inquest. It should get Medical Murder Findings and Human Organ Theft Motive Findings.
14. The Equity Lawyer has not had the opportunity to verify information that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr Rishi Sunak, has a 1st Cousin who is also a 1^st Cousin to Sunaina Chaudhari. He does not know whether the Family Connection influenced the appointment of Mr Sunak as Chancellor of the Exchequer.
15. In any event, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Foreign Secretary, Prime Minister, Indian President, Commonwealth Leaders and USA President Mr Biden can use the Death Inquest Case to invite people everywhere to share the Remedy Process.  President Biden was Vice President when Prime Minister Mr Cameron got Remedy Co-operation from President Obama. He has Governance Responsibility for a Divided Society in a Corona Virus Emergency. A Unifying Idea and Unification Commitment Proof can get Governance Credibility for him in the first 100 days in office. The Justice Priority Obligation and Equity Governance Processes are a Unifying Idea. He might appreciate the Unifying Idea and a chance to give Commitment Proof to get Governance Credibility in case he is unable to achieve anything else he wishes to achieve in the first 100 days.
16. Honourable Parliamentarians cannot wait for President Biden. Good Management requires Rapid Remedies and a chance for President Biden to share them.    

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-12-18-Royal-Commission-Contempt-5th-Fraud-Appeal-Grounds-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-12-21-Royal-Commission-Claim-Fraud-Fraud-Appeals-x-5-Medical-Disclosure-Proposal-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2021-01-01-Royal-Commission-2020-000286-2020-0396-2069-New-Evidence-Remedy-Applications-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General