To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers, Law Court Judges

Trial Change Notice from 2 days to 1 day and from Trial to Case Dismissal for the Stated Reason that Chronically High Urea Levels needs a Blood Cleaning Dialysis Treatment Increase from 2 Sessions to 3 Sessions a week and the Session Days are not yet known.

Witness Protection Negotiation Offer to the State Lawyers and Solicitor General

Contempt Fraud Investigations are needed to discover whether Treatment Settings and Disclosure Delays by Renal Doctors were used to get High Potassium Levels and Chronically High Urea Levels that State Officers and Law Court Judges needed for Case Management Sabotage Frauds against the Equity Lawyer

1. In 2017 the Equity Lawyer was physically fit and so did not pay much attention to a Heart Stress Test needed for a Fitness Qualification for a Kidney Transplant.
2. In 2018 and 2019 Blackmail Frauds by Top Doctors against Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis used Kidney Failure Treatment Denial Threats and Mental Examination Consent Demands. They got a Consent Refusals by the Equity Lawyer and disclosure the Refusal Reason was that the Corruption Remedy Process had priority over the Kidney Failure Treatment
3. In April 2020 End Stage Kidney Failure caused Blood Toxin Dumps in the flesh and did enormous Body Damage to the Equity Lawyer. It got an Emergency Hospital Admission for Blood Cleaning Dialysis Treatment to remove Blood Toxins. Urea is the most serious toxin. Top Doctors used a Secret Diagnosis Fraud and Prescription Fraud to get Urea Retention Side Effects that were a Dialysis Treatment Sabotage Fraud. The Drugs Nurse gave the Equity Lawyer a pill and locked the Pill Bottle in the Drugs Cabinet. The next day Drug Questions by the Equity Lawyer got Embarrassed Behaviour and a Case Reference to the Renal Doctors. Drug Questions by the Equity Lawyer got Ignorance Claims by the Renal Doctor.
4. The Remedy Process Priority then was to investigate Relationship Recovery between Medics and the Patient. It discovered Rapid Recovery between Nurse and Patient but Minimal Direct Contact between Doctor and Patient
5. The Equity Lawyer realised Blood Test Results were the Only Communications Channel for him to the Renal Doctors. He suspected they would use Treatment Settings for Body Maintenance and No Improvement. The Body Damage resulted in Extreme Unfitness. Kidney Transplants are subject to a Fitness Condition. To the best of the recollection of the Equity Lawyer the Stress Test lasted 45 minutes. He decided on Fitness Recovery for Body Improvement and Transplant Fitness Qualification. He developed the ability for 5 Mile Runs in 1 Hour that needed Recovery Days. It was as if the Subconscious made Deep Sleep a condition for Healing Services. He did not know that Fitness Efforts caused Chronically High Urea Levels. Fitness Improvements gave him a False Impression of his Health State.  
6. Regular Blood Test Results got Case Management Decisions by Renal Doctors and Very Limited Disclosure to the Equity Lawyer.
7. The Equity Lawyer realised something was wrong. Information Requests got Disclosure Failures by the Medical Staff.
8. The High Potassium Levels got Case References from Renal Doctors to Dieticians who did nothing. No one told the Equity Lawyer. Chronically High Urea Levels got No Disclosure by Renal Doctors to the Equity Lawyer.
9. The Corona Virus Emergency was the reason given for a 2 Dialysis Session Limit for most Patients that was increased to 3 and then reduced to 2.
10. The Treatment Review Appointment was listed for 18^th November 2020.
11. The 1^st High Potassium Notice the Equity Lawyer had was a comment by a Renal Nurse that he had the Strongest Dialysis Agent.
12. The 2^nd High Potassium Notice was Express Notice by a Renal Nurse. It got Immediate Diet Changes by the Equity Lawyer. Also, it got presentation of a Care Plan by a Nurse for the Equity Lawyer to read and approve. He asked for a copy. She refused. He protested. She said she needed Special Authority to give him a copy. The Equity Lawyer noticed that the Care Plan required Diet Advice. The Equity Lawyer said he had no contact from Dieticians.
13. The 3^rd High Potassium Notice was from a Renal Nurse and came with a Treatment Increase Notice from 2 to 3 Dialysis Sessions a week. It got Diet Changes Notice and Session Increase Refusal Pending Further Blood Tests from the Equity Lawyer.
14. On 3^rd November 2020 Trial Event was used for Conflict Disqualification Warnings, Ill Health Warnings, the Remedy Applications dated 31^st October 2020 and a Medical Records Production Application by the Equity lawyer. They got Conflict Disqualification Denial Frauds, Recusal Refusal Fraud, Remedy Refusal Fraud and Medical Records Production Denial Fraud and Medical Evidence Filing Permit by Trial Judge Mr Jay.
15. On 6^th November 2020, there was a Reluctant Refusal and Recusal Judgement with Reason Frauds by Justice Mr Jay.
16. On 9th November 2202, there was a Recusal and Trial Directions Confirmation Order that was a Recusal Breach Fraud by Justice Mr Jay.
17. On 11th November 2020, the Equity Lawyer completed Draft Remedy Orders for the Fraud Appeal against the Bias Frauds of Justice Mr Jay.
18. On 11^th November 2020, the Kidney Failure Dialysis Treatment Review was Without Notice brought forward 7 days by the renal Doctor and conducted in the Dialysis Session. The Renal Doctor who could not explain the Urea Poison Frauds 6 months earlier disclosed that the High Potassium Levels was not the only reason for Sessions Increase from 2 to 3 a week but Chronically High Urea Levels was an Additional Reason. The Equity Lawyer gave a Brief Explanation of the Corruption Remedy Process, Court Record Frauds, the need for the Audio Records as Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals and the need to prepare for the Contempt Trial on 14^th and 15^th December 2020. It became obvious the Chronic Urea Levels were a Very Bad Risk. The Equity Lawyer asked how long he had got. The Renal Doctor shrugged his shoulders and said two months. The Equity Lawyer did not believe him but did not say so. He feels he has much less than that. The Fitness Efforts are a Urea Risk. There is no point achieving Transplant Fitness and then losing it because Corrupt Officers are in Desperate Denial of the Corruption Remedy Process. The Equity Lawyer took Life Risks earlier in the Remedy Process. It has reached the late stages. There is no need to take them now. 
19. 12^th November 2020 the Equity lawyer decided to give the Remedy Process as much attention as he could for one week before the Session Increase from 2 to 3 a week. 
20. The Trial Dates of 14^th or 15^th December 2020 can be used for a Retrial and Case Dismissal Application by the Equity Lawyer that gets an Audio Record for the Honourable Parliamentarians, Lord Bishops and Crown.

The Fraud Appeal Draft Orders dated 11^th November 2020 and the Retrial and 2020 000286 Case Dismissal Application Notice and Draft Orders dated 12^th Nov ember 2020 are attached.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-11-11-Royal-Commission-Claim-2020-000286-Fraud-Appeals-2020-0396-PI-10942-XXXX-Remedy-Draft-Orders-for-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-11-12-Royal-Commission-2020-000286-Remedy-Draft-Order-for-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-11-12-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Remedy-Application-Notice-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General-n244-eng

To: House of  Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers, Law Court Judges and Mortgage Brokers

The Fall Guy Conspiracy by Appeal Lord Justices against Lower Rank Judges was a Predictable Failure.

The Royal Commission Email on 9^th November 2020 gave Damage Limitation Advice that High Court Justice Mr Jay use Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 for Remedy Orders and a Contempt Fraud Case Reference to Appeal Lord Justices.

The Trust Frauds against Citizen Mr Sood included Sale Orders that attracted High Stamp Duty instead of Title Transfer Orders from the Old Trustee to the New Trustee that attracted Low Stamp Duty.  It got Crime Proceeds Status for the Sale Stamp Duty. The Youngest Son Mr Aman Sood made two Purchase Offers that got Sale Refusal Fraud Proof, Sale Order Breach Contempt Fraud Proof and Wasted Costs Fraud Proof against the Trustee Son Mr Vishall Sood and Contempt Immunity Fraud Proof against the County Court.

The Youngest Son has got acceptance for a 3^rd Mortgage that enables a 3^rd Purchase Offer for Damage Limitation Tests of Judges in the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal.

The Land Fraud Title Holders are Title Trustees for the Victims. The Fraud Remedies need Title Transfers from the Title Trustees to the Beneficiaries or New Trustees with Mortgage Arrangements where needed.

The Honourable Parliamentarians, Lord Bishops and Crown are interested to know whether or not the Victims get Voluntary Co-operation by Mortgage Lenders. It needs:

1. Mortgage Transfers from Old Trustee to New Trustee or a Re-mortgage Classification instead of a Purchase Classification
2. Trustee Transfers instead of Sale Transfers
3. Credit Qualification Waivers and Mortgage Obligation Waivers for the 2^nd Trustees needed to give a Valid Receipt for Capital Money.

Mortgage Possession Frauds by the Family Estate Mortgagees, Trustee Sons and County Court against Citizen Father Mr Sood create for a New Mortgage by the Youngest Sons.

Citizen Mr Sood will please file the Interim Remedy Applications, Draft Order and Fee Remission Applications by Email Filing and by Signed For Post in the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal and report the result. It is needed for the Cypress Gardens Lease Possession Claim Fraud F02ED793 that has a Case Review Hearing on 24th November 2020 by County Court Judges who committed the Family Estate Trust Frauds

The Government Lawyers procured the 2020 000286 Trial Frauds and have a duty to act as Application Service Receiving Agent for the Inland Revenue.

The Mortgage Brokers will please use the case for a Remedy Co-operation Test of the Mortgage Lenders.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-11-10-Royal-Commission-B01B0837-2020-000968-2020-0742-Royal-Commission-Trust-Fraud-Damage-Interim-Remedy-DRAFT-Order-for-Citizen-Mr-Sood-v-Trustee-Mr-Sood

2020-11-10-Royal-Commission-B01B0837-Sale-Order-Breach-Contempt-Fraud-Damage-Interim-Application-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Sood-v-Trustee-Mr-Sood-n244-eng

2020-08-06-Royal-Commission-ZC14D02308-Fraud-Revocation-Application-Representations-Proposals-of-Citizen-Mrs-Theodorou-v-Mr-Theodorou

2020-08-03-Royal-Commission-Lease-Claim-F02ED793-Pession-Denial-Appeal-Draft-Order-of-Citizen-Mr-Hastunc-v-Eatsnow-Estates-Limited-

2020-11-09-15-37-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Trial-Misconduct-Evidence-Polite-Request-Email

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers, Law Court Judges and Journalist Mr Rozenberg

Polite Notice to Journalist Mr Rozenberg that the Royal Commission Emails give Citizen Case Papers to the Cabinet and Parliament at the same time as they are served on the State or filed in the Law Courts. It enables Honourable Parliamentarians to conduct Corruption Investigations and discover what the State and Law Courts did with them. It is Totally Predictable that Corrupt Officers commit Evidence Destruction Frauds and Computer Record Frauds.

Polite Notice to Journalist Mr Rozenberg that Citizen Papers in the Corruption Remedy Process use the Citizen Oriented Style. The Familiar Phrases are identified by Capital Letters. Use of the 3^rd Person eliminates the need for Jurors to convert the 1^st and 2^nd Person into the 3^rd Person in Jury Discussions. The Familiar Phrases and use of the 3^rd Person assist Jury Findings by Lord Bishop Jurors in Parliament Courts and Lay Jurors in Law Courts.

Polite Request to Journalist Mr Rozenberg for Trial Misconduct Evidence against 2020 000286 Trial Judge Mr Jay for the Stated Reasons that Trial Misconduct Article of the Journalist appeared on 15^th June 2020 in the Law Society Gazette and there are Reasons Suspicions of a Fall-Guy Conspiracy against Trial Judge Mr Jay by Corrupt Parliamentarians and Appeal Lord Justices who are Investigation Targets in the Corruption Remedy Process.

Fall-Guy Conspiracy Reasonable Suspicion Notice and Remedy-Only Jurisdiction Limit Acknowledgment from Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis to 2020 000286 High Court Mr Jay

1. Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Recusal Refusal and Trial Direction Orders dated 3^rd November 2020 were followed by the Recusal and Direction Confirmation Order dated 9^th November 2020 by Trial Judge Jay. The Conflict Recusal was valid. The Trial Confirmation Orders are invalid. Justice Mr Jay has a Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit for the Equity Lawyer against the State and Remedy Advice from the Equity Lawyer to use it.
2. The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops have Justice Responsibilities known as the Equity Monarchy Trusts. They have Corruption Control Jurisdictions that govern Parliament Session Powers. They were dormant for 45 years. In 2004 Prime Minister Mr Blair joined a Criminal Conspiracy by European Leaders to commit Referenda Election Frauds. It got Fraud Proof Sets and use of them to revive the Equity Monarchy Trusts. It got a Corruption Remedy Process that has continued ever since.
3. The Parliament Session Agreement in December 2019 between the Crown and Prime Minister required that a Royal Commission get Corruption Remedies before the Session End. The Default Penalty is a Parliament Session Refusal and Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof and Remedy Denial Fraud Proof. On 19th December 2019, the Queen announced it in the Parliament Session Opening Speech.
4. Honourable Parliamentarians needed Criminal Conspiracy Proof to silence Corrupt Parliamentarians until Unfitness Cases got Corruption Findings and Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges. Citizens got it.
5. Corrupt Officers tried to defend themselves by use of Evidence Destruction and Computer Record Frauds that are Forgery Proof and Perjury Proof against the Law Courts and the Ministry of Justice. It created the need for Audio Records that are Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals.
6. Citizens had Corruption Cases with Hearing Events. Most of them lacked the Management Capacity to cope with Hearing Frauds Conspiracies by Qualified Lawyers and Law Court Judges. The case of Equity Lawyer Mr Edward William Ellis was an exception. He provided Investigation Services for the Crown and Lord Bishops. The Protection Fraud Network needed Protection Frauds to reassure Corrupt Officers they were safe. The planned to do it by use of the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 for an Imprisonment Fraud against the Equity Lawyer. He planned use of it to get Audio Records of Trial Frauds by the State Representatives and Trial Judges.
7. Corrupt Parliamentarians and Appeal Lord Justices made a Damage Limitation Plan for themselves. It needed a Fall-Guy Conspiracy against a Lower Rank Judge. High Court Justice Mr Jay was excellent for the purpose.
   1. On 19^th July High Court Justice Mr Jay sat for Short Notice Hearings of Restraint Applications by the State against Citizens. He reassured himself that he had Statutory Immunity for Court Frauds by referring to a Justice Act in the 1940’s. It was a Protection Fraud by Parliament for the State against War Damage Victims. Hearing Judge Jay used the Public Gallery Witness Status of Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis for a Restraint Breach Investigation Order Fraud against him. It used a Party Status Denial Fraud, Notice Denial Fraud, Hearing Denial Fraud and Jurisdiction Usurpation Fraud. It got Contempt Claim Frauds and General Civil Restraint Frauds and the Restraint Breach Imprisonment Committal Trial. The Crown and Lord Bishops issued Case Management Orders that enabled each stage of the case to service Corruption Investigations of the Law Courts for the Remedy Process. The result was a 4 year and 4 months’ delay between the Investigation Fraud and the Trial Fraud.
   2. His Intelligence and Self Defence Capacity were Totally Compromised by Arrogance and Dishonesty.
8. The Set-Up Conditions needed:
   1. Reliance on the Equity Lawyer to use the Trial Fraud to get Proof Sets for the Unfitness Case
   2. Trial Misconduct Findings in the Defamation Trial Fraud Appeal Judgment in the case of Polish Claimant Mr Serafin v Polish Editor Mr Malkiewicz
   3. Profession Press Publicity for the Trial Misconduct Findings in an article by Journalist Mr Joshua Rozenberg on the Law Society Gazette
   4. Repeat Protection Breach Contempt Fraud and Trial Listing Fraud
   5. Conflict Qualification Fraud to get the Trial Allocation Fraud to Justice Mr Jay
   6. Trial Bundle Omission Frauds by the State Lawyers of Relevant Evidence created between June and November 2020
   7. Forgery and Perjury Allegation Frauds by the State Advocate against the Receipt Stamps given by the Sussex Crown Prosecutors when acting as Receiving Agent of Official Records for the Parliament Session File kept by the Director of Public Prosecutions held on trust for the Prime Minister to give the Crown when needed for Parliament Session Decisions.
   8. Contempt Immunity Frauds by Justice Mr Jay for the State Lawyers and the State Advocate
   9. Use of the Parliament Session File in Parliament for a Misrepresentation Fraud Finding and Contempt Fraud Finding against the State Advocate
   10. Use of the Contempt Fraud Finding for a Contempt Immunity Fraud Finding against Trial Judge Mr Jay

All of it was a Sabotage Fraud against the Remedy Process. The Sabotage Remedy needs a Conspiracy Warning and Remedy Proposal by the Equity Lawyer that gives Trial Judge Mr Jay the choice of creating Damage Mitigation Proof for himself or creating Aggravated Contempt Fraud Proof against himself by failing to do so.

1. Use the Validity Presumption for the Equity Lawyer to require Rebuttal Proof from the State.
2. Use the Validity Presumption and Bundle Omission Fraud Allegations by the Equity Lawyer for an Evidence Audit Order against the State.
3. Use a Polite Request for Audit Assistance by the House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet and Privy Councillors.
4. Use the Validity Presumption and Crown Prosecution Service Receipt Stamps on Citizen Papers and the Stamp Forgery Representations by the State Advocate for a Rebuttal Proof Disclosure Order against the State Representatives and State Advocate.
5. Use the Validity Presumption and Health Fraud Allegations by the Equity Lawyer for a Medical Records production Order against NHS Trusts and Ministry of Health.
6. Use the Fraud Appeals for a Superior Jurisdiction Protection Admission and Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit Admission and Contempt Case Reference to the Court of Appeal.
7. The Case Reference to the Court of Appeal will give Appeal Lord Justices the choice of creating Damage Mitigation Proof for themselves or creating Aggravated Contempt Fraud Proof against themselves.
8. The Damage Mitigation Proof requires Full Disclosure who in Parliament provided Protection Frauds.
9. The Remedy Process needs a Settlement Negotiation Meeting between the Equity Lawyer, Cabinet and Prime Minister to decide what to do with the Damage Mitigation Proof or the Aggravated Contempt Fraud Proof.

The Contempt 2020 000286 Trial Directions Order dated 3^rd November 2020 evidences the Refusal Decisions against the Remedy Proposals dated 31^st October 2020 but omits the Medical Records Production Refusal. The Proposals and Orders dated 3^rd and 9^th November 2020 are attached.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-10-31-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Remedy-Proposals-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General-1

2020-11-03-Contemp-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Commital-Trial-Adjournment-Direction-Orders-in-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-11-09-Contempt-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Recusal-Order-of-Trial-Judge-Mr-Jay-in-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councilors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Trial Adjournment Order Amendment Demand for the Stated Reason it omits the Medical Records Production Refusal for the Ministry of Health and Mid Sussex Hospital Trust against the Equity Lawyer. The Admissions, Findings and Order Applications detailed in the Proposals dated 31st October 2020 included Party Status and Profession Unfitness Investigation Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the General Medical Council to remedy the Health Frauds committed by Top Doctors. They got Refusal Decisions by the Trial Judge who then gave Medical Evidence Filing Permission. It required the Equity Lawyer to ask the Top Doctors who committed the Health Frauds for Medical Opinions. The Equity Lawyer asked for a Medical Evidence Production Order against the Ministry of Health and Mid Sussex Hospital Authority because it evidenced the Medical Frauds and the Treatment Needs. The Medical Frauds included a Secret Diagnosis Fraud and Prescription Fraud to get Urea Retention Side effects that were a Urea Poison Fraud and a Dialysis Treatment Sabotage Fraud.  Drug Questions got Embarrassed Behaviour by the Drugs Nurse and a Case Reference to Renal Doctors. They could not explain the Urea Poison Fraud. They lacked the confidence for a Forced Medication Fraud. The Medical Records and Drug Audit Records prove it.  The Trial Order includes the Medical Evidence Filing Permission but omits the Medical Records Access Denial Fraud.

Adjourned Trial Date and Time Limit Change Possibility Notice to the High Court. The Evidence Balance starts with a Validity Presumption for the Citizen subject to Rebuttal Proof from the State. The Adjournment Application by the Equity Lawyer used a Tiredness Reason. The State did not offer Rebuttal Proof. The Trial Judge did not ask for Rebuttal Proof. and made a Doubt Finding against the Equity Lawyer and a Doubt Benefit Finding for the Equity Lawyer. They were Evidence Frauds and Finding Frauds. Less than 24 hours later the Renal Team used the  Dialysis Session on 4th November 2020 to inform Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis that the Blood Test Results merit an increase from 2 to 3 Dialysis Sessions a week. He said that they had not allowed him access to the Blood Test Results or disclosed High Toxin Results and thereby delayed Diet Changes by him. He explained that he implemented Diet Changes as soon as he knew about the High Toxin Results. They agreed to New Tests to discover whether the Diet Changes were good enough for 2 Sessions a week.

Citizen Father Mr Sood has Limited English Language and Case Management Incapacity to cope with a Criminal Conspiracy by his Son and Law Court Judges for Incapacity Exploitation Frauds and Hearing Frauds. He filed and served Draft Orders that explained his case. He did not participate in the Telephone Hearing on 23rd October 2020. It got a Pending Superior Adjudication Adjudication Enforcement Stay Protection Refusal by the County Court. The Fraud Appeals got Appeal Jurisdiction Denials by the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal and County Court claimed the High Court has Appeal Jurisdiction. The High Court used Participation Failure in the Telephone Hearing for an Appeal Denial Fraud. It forced a Set Aside Application in the County Court. All of it is Criminal Conspiracy Proof and Pending Adjudication Protection Denial Fraud Proof against the Officers and Judges of the Law Courts. Honourable Parliamentarians can ask Prime Minister Mr Johnson to explain what he did to procure Fraud Beneficiary Status in the High Court Corruption Claim and Court of Appeal Fraud Appeal.

Citizen Mr Sood will please file the attached  Set Aside Application Notice and Draft Orders.

Honourable Parliamentarians will please ask the Fraud Beneficiary Status Questions.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-11-05-Royal-Commission-Trust-Claim-Fraud-B01B0837-Remedy-Application-Notice-of-Citizen-Father-Mr-Sood-v-Trustee-Son-Mr-Sood

2020-11-05-Royal-Commission-B01B0837-Protection-Enforcement-Corruption-Remedy-DRAFT-Order-of-Citizen-Father-Mr-Sood-v-Son-Mr-Sood

2020-11-03-Contemp-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Commital-Trial-Adjournment-Other-Orders-in-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

On 3rd November 2020, High Court Justice Mr Jay said he intended to approve the Trial Order Frauds within 48 hours. 

High Court officers have a duty to bring the attached Fraud Appeal Draft Grounds to his attention so that he can consider use of Remedy Jurisdiction for Fraud Revocations.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis 

2020-11-04-Royal-Commission-Contempt-2020-000286-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-Grounds-Remedy-Proposals-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

Attached are the Royal Commission and Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Remedy Proposals dated 31^st October 2020.

They include Polite Requests for Remedy Co-operation by the Cabinet and Prime Minister.

The dignity of Parliament needs and acknowledgement that MPs have serviced the Remedy Process. The Polite Request to the Right Honourable MPs Iain Duncan Smith, David Davis and Jacob Rees Mogg do that. There are others.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-10-31-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Remedy-Proposals-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General