Royal Commission, Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 10063, Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286, Drug Crime Bail Conditions Appeal and Contempt Remedy Application

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

The Protection Fraud Market has Risk Control Protocols. The Worst Risk for the Protection Fraud Market is Immunity Deals that get Remedy Co-operation and use it to get Corruption Proof against Top Judges. The  Protection Fraud Market manages the Immunity Risk by requiring Fraud Commitment Proof from the Receiver before the Protection Fraud Supply. Top Judges used Court Officers and a Lower Rank Judge to commit the 1st Fraud Appeal 2020 0396 Dismissal Frauds against the Equity Lawyer. The Remedy Process required that a Lord Justice accept Personal Responsibility for the Dismissal Frauds.  The Lord Justices required Fraud Commitment Proof from the State Officers in the Ministry of Justice who functioned as organised Crime Managers for the Top Judges. The Fraud Commitment proof was the Drug Crime Investigation Fraud by the Metropolitan Police and Family Sabotage Fraud by Local Authority Officers against Citizens Mr and Mrs Nkrumah and their 3 Children. 

The Police Bail Conditions Fraud Appeal and Contempt Remedy Application of Citizens Mr and Mrs Nkrumah in Barkingside Magistrates Court  is listed for 11.00 on 1st February 2021

The Equity Lawyer will attend as Jurisdiction Fraud Witness for the Citizens, State and Court

The Citizens intend to print the documents dated 31st January 2021. The Magistrates Court Officers can print the rest. 

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2021-02-31-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Fraud-Remedy-DRAFT-Order-for-Citizens-Mr-and-Mrs-Nkrumah-v-State-

2021-01-31-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Fraud-Witness-Statement-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General

2021-01-20-Royal-Commission-2020-000286-Fraud-Appeals-x-5-Remedy-Application-Support-Statement-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2021-01-10-20-09-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Fraud-Complaint-against-the-House-of-Commons-Speaker-and-Court-of-Appeal-2021-PI-10069-YYYY-ZZZZ-Email-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-11-30-Royal-Commission-2020-000286-Case-Dismissal-Statement-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-11-30-Royal-Commission-2020-000286-Case-Dismissal-Brief-Details-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

Royal Commission, 2020000286, 2020 0396, 2069, PI 10063, Other Fraud Appeals and Lease Claim G00CR488

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

The Contempt Complaint against the House of Commons Speaker needs a Case Reference to All MPs.

Contempt Complaint Additional Evidence Notice.

  1. The MP Address List that the Speaker published after the 2019 General Election got 122 Bounce Messages from ceased to sit before the General Election. The Speaker ignored the MP Address List Requests by the Equity Lawyer.
  2. The Royal Commission Emails to House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <Lindsay.hoyle.mp@parliament.uk> got No Acknowledgements and then an Acknowledgement, Remedy Jurisdiction Denial and Speakers Office Email Address ‘speakersoffice@parliament.uk’ Notice and then No Responses until 2021
  3. The Royal Commission Emails to House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <speakersoffice@parliament.uk > get No Response.
  4. The Contempt Complaint against the Speaker is a Test Complaint that will get Relevant Evidence for the Parliament Session Remedy Condition Performance Trial Orders of the Crown and Trial Adjudication and Appeal Adjudication of the Lord Bishops
  5. The Royal Commission Emails are Parliament Session Agreement Corruption Remedy Condition Notices and Remedy Condition Performance Notices from the Equity Lawyer for the People to Parliament
  6. The Contempt Claim 2020 000286 and 5 Fraud Appeals got Remedy Denial Fraud Conspiracy Proof for the Equity Lawyer, Citizen Parliament and Crown against the State and Law Courts
  7. The attached Royal Commission, 2020 000286, Fraud Appeals 2021 PI 10063 Conflict Disqualification Recusal and Contempt Remedy Application dated 27th January 2021 of Equity Lawyer v Solicitor General services:
    1. the Contempt Trial in the High Court,
    2. the Fraud Appeal in the Court of Appeal
    3. the Contempt Fraud Unfitness Cases against Top Judges in Parliament
    4. the Fraud Case Stay and Contempt Fraud Remedy Applications by Citizen Victims against Organised Criminals and the State
  8. The Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Issue Denial Fraud, 2 Other Fraud Appeal Issue Denial Frauds and 2020 000286 Penalty Hearing Listing Failure raise Reasonable Suspicions that the Protection Fraud Deals between Corrupt Officers and the Top Judges needed Alternative Fraud Commitment Proof
  9. The Contempt Claim Fraud 2019 004208 Liability Trial Listing Order for 10th February 2021 raises Reasonable Suspicions it is the Alternative Fraud Commitment Proof. It got a Conflict Disqualification, Protection Breach Contempt Fraud Remedy Application Decision and Evidence Request by Citizen Ms Berry. It got Request Response from the Equity Lawyer of an All Relevant Evidence Offer with the Conflict Disqualification Recusal and Contempt Remedy Application dated 27th January 2021 as the Context Explanation and Case Explanation.

MP Address List REPEAT Request from the Equity Lawyer to the Speaker.

Justice Process Contempt Fraud Notice for the People against Journalist Mr Marr and the BBC

The Misrepresentation Fraud + Non-Disclosure Fraud + Parliament Contempt Fraud Complaints by Former Leader Mr Salmond got a Contempt Case Hearing by the Scottish Parliament. The Contempt Trial has Jurisdiction Superiority against the Publicity Jurisdiction of the Media. The Contempt Trial got Pending Adjudication Adverse Publicity Stay Protection Rights for Scottish Leader Ms Sturgeon against the Media. On Sunday 24th January 2021 the Television Broadcast of the Interview Exchanges between of Leader Ms Sturgeon and Journalist Mr Marr are Compelling Evidence that:

  1. Journalist Mr Marr, the Defamation Lawyers and the BBC ignored the Pending Adjudication Adverse Publicity Stay Protection Rights and committed Protection Breach Contempt Frauds against Scottish Leader Ms Sturgeon and the Scottish Parliament
  2. Scottish Leader Ms Sturgeon
    1. failed to manage a Dignity Defence for the Scottish Parliament, Damage Mitigation for herself by a Pending Adjudication Adverse Publicity Stay Protection Rights Notice, Contempt Fraud Complaint and Immediate Apology Demand
    2. confused the issue with Waffly Responses      
  3. Journalist Mr Marr failed to bring to the attention of the audience that:
    1. The Scottish Devolution Arrangements denied Parliament Session Powers needed for 1st Class Citizen Status, which the Scottish Citizen still has but only when dealing with the British Parliament  
    2. The late Scottish Lawyer Mr Jim Fiel spent decades collating Corruption Cases against the Scottish State and the Scottish Law Courts. Bad Cases got Emigration Advice from him to Victims. He needed a Lead Case, Victim Consent and Special Events to make the 1st Class Citizenship Case for Scottish Citizens. In 2014 the Scottish Referenda was the Special Event. A Sex Crime Framing Fraud that used DNA Elimination Proof Concealment Frauds was the Lead Case. Victim Consent was conditional upon Residency Rights for the Victim in a Middle Eastern State. Lawyer Mr Friel died in July 2014. The Residency Rights were got in August 2014. The Independence Referenda were in September 2014. After the death of Lawyer Mr Friel no one had the expertise and commitment to use the Victim Consent to make the 1st Class Citizenship Case for Scottish Citizens.
    3. 1st Class Citizenship deserves Issue Priority against a 2nd Independence Referenda   

Royal Commission Consequential Damage Test Case for Penge Restaurant Lease Possession Claim G00CR488.  Illiterate Immigrants were Easy Targets for Asset Theft Frauds. It made the Illiterate Immigrant Cases particularly useful getting the Asset Theft Fraud Conspiracy Proof, Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof for the Royal Commission. Land Frauds and Legal Representation Frauds against Citizen Mr Serbert did Consequential Damage that forced Penge Restaurant Manager Appointments by him that resulted in Total Frauds by the Restaurant Managers against him. The result is Fraud Claims against Organised Criminals, Lawyers, the Law Society and Ministry of Justice.  The Consequential Damages include the Penge Restaurant Damages. 

The Lease Claim G00CR488 Hearing on 12th February 2021 will get an Audio Record how the Hearing Judge in Croydon County Court deals with the Corruption Case Incapacity and Limited English Language Incapacity. It will be Relevant Evidence in the Contempt Claim 2020 000286, Fraud Appeals 2020 0396, 2069, PI 10063 and Other Fraud Appeals.    

Note: The Royal Commission Email Address List gets Bounce Messages from some of the Law Firms that serviced Court Frauds against Citizens. They remain on the Address List so that they have Contempt Case Progress Notices that they can give Case Management Advice to their Clients. In some cases Blocked Messages are Notice Rejection Fraud Proof for Clients, Profession Authorities and Law Courts against the Law Firms. A Royal Commission Email was a Publicity Notice for the Immunity Negotiation Offer to the Land Fraud F02ED793 Landlords. Immunity Negotiation Offers in Other Cases did not get Publicity Notices   

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2019-12-22-Royal-Commission-Case-Notice-Case-Papers-Demand-Profession-Unfitness-Complaint-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Serbert-v-Dotcom-Solicitors

2020-11-30-Possession-Claim-G00CR488-Defence-and-Counterclaim-signature-of-Tenant-Mr-Ali-Serbert-v-Realgild-Developments-Limited

2021-01-27-Lease-Claim-G00CR488-Defence-Form-of-Citizen-Mr-Serbert-v-Realgold-Developments-Limited

2021-01-28-Royal-Commission-2020-000286-Fraud-Appeals-Contempt-Notice-Lease-Claim-G00CR488-Notice-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

Royal Commission, 2020 000286, Fraud Appeal 2021 100063 Issue Refusal Fraud and Dismissal Fraud Appeal Email of Equity Lawyer v Solicitor General

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

Contempt Fraud Appeal against the Court of Appeal Fraud Appeal PI 10063 Conflict Qualification Fraud, Automatic Issue Denial Fraud, 43 Day Filing Acknowledgement Delay Fraud, Before Issue Approval Process Fraud, Appealed Decision Identification Deficit Pretence Fraud, Appealed Decision Proof Deficit Pretence Fraud, Deficit Remedy Time Limit Imposition Pretence Fraud and Before Issue Dismissal Fraud by the Case Judges and Supervision Judges of the Court of Appeal that used an Alleged Anonymous Master and an Alleged Anonymous Jurisdiction Lawyer and is evidenced by:

  1. the Pending Investigation Reference Notice Email at 16.08 on 7th January 2021 from Urgent Case Officer Mr Peter Cobourn and
  2. the Filing Denial Fraud Email 14.57 on 8th January 2021 from Case Officer Mr Yobi Oma and
  3. the Dismissal Fraud Email at 10.24 on 20th January 2021 from Urgent Case Officer Mr Peter Cobourn

Grounds: Fraudulent Breaches of Natural Justice, Human Rights and Overriding Justice Objective

Contempt Fraud Complaint, Office Unfitness Complaint and Criminal Conspiracy Complaint for Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis, Parliament, the Crown and People against the Case Officers, Supervising Officers, Case Judges and Supervising Judges of the Court of Appeal for the Stated Reasons that the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 and 5 Fraud Appeals got Issue Denial Fraud Proof against the Court of Appeal that is Protection Breach Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Proof against the State and Law Courts.

Brief Reasons:

  1. The Protection Fraud Network managed the Protection Fraud Market. They used Appointment Frauds for Corrupt Judges to ensure the Protection Fraud Supply. The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 and the 5 Fraud Appeals forced a Protection Fraud Deal that got Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof against Organised Criminals, State Officers, Representatives and Law Court Judges all the way up the ranks to Lord Justice of the Court of Appeal. Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 100063 is part of it.
  2. The Contempt Fraud Appeal Notice lists the Appeal Frauds and the Email Evidence. The Conflict Qualification Fraud is the Key Liability Fraud. The others are Damage Management Frauds. They Case Records are Self Evident Fraud Proof. It is no accident.
  3. The Justice Priority needs Corruption Controls. The Key Corruption Control is a Neutrality Qualification Obligation + Conflict Disqualification Disclosure Obligation for the People against Justice Offices. It needs a Key Corruption Controller. The Citizen is the Key Corruption Controller. The Conflict Disqualification Fraud is the Easiest Crime for the Citizen to prove because the Official Records are the Fraud Proof. Anyone can use Intelligence and Decency to function as Citizen and manage the Key Corruption Controls for the People against Corrupt Officers.
  4. The Corruption Remedy Proof Standard is Official Records that are Justice Proof for Honourable Officers or Guilt Proof against Corrupt Officers and Credibility Irrelevance Proof for Victims.
  5. The Corruption Remedy Process does two things. It is a Damage Limitation Control against Incompetent Use of Accountability Powers by the Citizen. It enables the Conflict Qualification Fraud to be the Easiest Crime for the Citizen to prove. It enables Competent Use of Accountability Powers by the Citizen to get Conflict Qualification Fraud Proof Sets that meet the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard.
  6. An Equity Lawyer is anyone who has the expertise and commitment to get Proof Sets that meet the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard and then know how to use it to service the Equity Monarchy Trusts. They are the Justice Responsibilities of the Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops. They have Corruption Control Jurisdictions that govern Parliament Session Powers.
  7. Most Citizens need and Equity Lawyer to get the Proof Sets. Some Citizens have the expertise and commitment to get the Proof Sets. Few know how to use them to service the Equity Monarchy Trusts. The Remedy Process needs to increase the number who do know and inspire more to serve as Citizen.
  8. The Brief Reasons service the Issue Denial Fraud Appeal in the Court of Appeal service the Contempt Fraud Complaint, Judicial Office Unfitness Complaint and Criminal Conspiracy Complaint in Parliament.
  9. The Extended Reasons are a Remedy Publicity Tool for Parliament and the Crown to service:
    1. The Corruption Findings + Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges by Parliament.
    2. The Judiciary Purification Process and Corruption Victim Identification Process for the People
    3. The Case Remedy Management Process for the Corruption Victims
    4. The Constitution Changes needed to restore the Parliament Session Powers of the British Citizen that Devolution Arrangements took from the Scottish Citizen, Welsh Citizen and Northern Ireland Citizen
    5. Media Management Changes that:
      1. use Valid Due Process Deficits, Positive Proof and Source Personal Identification for Publicity Accountability
      2. use Publicity Accountability Failures for Damage Penalties against Publicity Managers
      3. use Falsehood Negligence Finding, Falsehood Malice Findings, Falsehood Damage Findings, Publicity Management Unfitness Finding for Publicity Restraint Orders and Publicity Damage Penalties against Publicity Fraud Managers
    6. A Polite Request that USA President Mr Biden
      1. assist with a Peace Quality Improvement Plan for Northern Ireland that needs Increased Accountability Powers for the Citizen that enable Corruption Findings and Dismissal Decisions against Top State Officers and Law Court Judges for the Northern Irish Citizen
      2. assist with an Arms Reduction Plan and Empowerment Plan for the US Citizen that achieves a Dependency Transfer for Justice Priority Arguments against Lethal Weapons
      3. assist with Diplomatic Representations for Citizen Empowerment in All Sovereign States  
      4. assist with Publicity Accountability everywhere
  10. Most People need an Oral Explanation to convert Written Material into Real Understanding. The Jury Oriented Style is designed to enable Written Material to service the Oral Explanations. It uses the Third Person and Capital Letter to Identify Familiar Phrases. It enables a Competent Advocate to help Lay Jurors make Jury Findings. It enables Competent Citizens to assist the Remedy Process with Mass Publicity by explaining it to Friends, Neighbours and Anyone Else. It enables everyone to progress at their own pace with Oral Explanations and Written Material. Given a bit of time and help a Bright 16-Year-Old can understand it and an Average 21-Year-Old can explain it.  Most of them will be able to do it a bit at a time. Older people are likely to find it easier because they grew up with Equity Governance.       

Extended Reasons

  1. The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops have Justice Responsibilities known as the Equity Monarchy Trusts. They have Corruption Control Jurisdictions that govern Parliament Session Powers.  The Citizen has Investigation Jurisdiction. The Crown had Prosecution Jurisdiction. It is the power to issue Trial Orders of Corruption Cases against the State and Unfitness Cases against Officers and Authorities. The Lord Archbishops have Court Lawyer Jurisdiction, one for the Trial Court and the other for the Appeal Court. The Lord Bishops have Adjudication Jurisdiction. There are 24 of them so that up to 12 can sit as Trial Jurors and up to 12 Others can sit as Appeal Jurors.
  2. The Parliament Session Jurisdictions use the Common Obligation and Common Empowerment to service the Justice Priority, Equity Processes of Truth Discovery and Just Reasoning, Neutrality Qualifications + Conflict Disclosure Obligation for Justice Officers, and the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard.
  3. The Corruption Remedy Proof Standard. It is Official Records that are Justice Proof for Honourable Officers for Guilt Proof against Corrupt Officers and Credibility Irrelevance Proof for the Victim. It eliminates the need for Witness Attendances and Witness Credibility Findings, and enables Rapid Processing of Trial Orders by the Crown. It is a Damage Limitation Control against Incompetent Management by the Citizen.
  4. An Equity Lawyer is anyone who has the expertise and commitment for Case management that gets Proof Sets that meet the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard and knows how to use it to service the Equity Monarchy Trusts.
  5. The Conflict Disqualification Disclosure Obligation makes Conflict Qualification Fraud the easiest crime to prove because Official Records are the Fraud Proof.   
  6. The Politicians made a Unification Plan and Dictatorship Plan for Western European States. It needed a Common Standard for Dictator Powers Standard. The European Constitution defined the Common Standard. It vested Dictator Powers in the State. Electronic Signature Dictator Powers were the Key Dictator Power. It enabled State Officers to make Immediate Obedience Demands supported by Financial Asset Loss Threats using Electronic Signature Termination Powers. It needed Dictator Powers Concealment Frauds as Election Frauds until the Governance Referenda got Referenda Acceptance of the Dictator Powers, and then Valid Result Pretence Frauds. It was a Doom Plan. It was Totally Predictable that Dictator Powers would service the Predation Priority of Organised Crime and result in Total Destruction of Governance Credibility.
  7. Rapid Process of the Dictator Plan needed Governance Referenda that gave a choice between Equity Governance and Dictator Governance. The British Referenda would serve as an Education Process about the Equity Monarchy Trusts that informed British Voters their choice was between Accountability Powers for the Citizen and Dictator Powers for the State. The Dictator Politicians knew it would get Referenda Rejection against Dictator Powers. They used Equity Governance Sabotage Frauds against the British Citizen that needed an Execution Period of 45 Years. The Dictator Plan Execution Period was a Dormancy Period for the Equity Monarchy Trusts.
  8. British Citizens made an Equity Governance Recovery Plan. It exploited Key Weaknesses in the Dictator Plan and the Predictable Consequences. The first was Total Dependency of Dictator Governance on Electronic Signature Powers. It needed Advanced Electronic Signatures for the European Union Citizen that broke the Electronic Signature Monopoly of the European States. It needed the Sophisticated Services that enabled the European Union Citizen to managed Tax Haven Estates and use Taxation Starvation to get Forced Conversion from Dictator Governance to Equity Governance. The second was the Total Predictability that the Dictator Powers would service the Predation Priority of Organised Crime and British Prime Minister would have Total Dependence on Organised Crime when in office. It needed Corruption Proof against a Prime Minister and use of it to end the Dormancy Period and revive the Equity Monarchy Trusts.
  9. The Politicians made International Agreements that vested Dictator Powers in the State. In every Member State of the European Union the Politicians lost control to State Officers and Law Court Judges who formed Organised Crime Partnerships.  They developed Protection Fraud Networks to provide Support Services and Corruption Co-ordination. They sold Market Frauds to Organised Crime, provided Protection Frauds for Corrupt Officers who managed them and traded Glittering Career Guarantees and Job Profits in exchange for Fraud Services by Corrupt Parliamentarians. General Electio0ns got Governing Majorities that were subject to remedy denial Fraud Majorities controlled by the Protection Fraud Networks.
  10. Equity Lawyer Mr Edward William Ellis and a Graphologist developed Writing Behaviour Analysis Technology that was the Key Component for the provision of Advanced Electronic Signatures. It needed the Computer Market to deliver Processing Upgrades for the Mass Market to cope with the Data Processing. In March 1998 the Technology Development and the Computing Capacity Upgrades enabled Viable Services for User Identification that used Writing Behaviour Analysis. The Profit Plan was On-Line Services. The Defence Plan was Source Code Secrecy. It needed Internet Technology for Document Management that enabled Sophisticated Services. Then it needed Priming Business to provide Live Usage Data that enabled System Settings and the Cash Flow for Full Time Services.
  11. European Leaders heard about it. Some of them made a Personal Profit Plan. They were inspired by the Plunder Frauds committed by the Nazi Dictator Mr Hitler against the German People. They included Copyright Licence Fees for Postage Stamp Images. The Personal Profit Plan needed a Writing Behaviour Analysis Source Code Theft, Behaviour Analysis Use Identification for All State Business and All Bank Business and Usage Licence Fees for the Source Code Theft Conspirators.
  12. Prime Minister Mr Blair was a Source Code Theft Conspirator. They appointed him as Theft Manager. He used Barclays Bank Group Board as the Theft Agent. They used Bank Officers. The Case Management by Prime Minister Mr Blair and the Bank Officers was Consistently Bad and Obviously Co-ordinated. A series of Business Meeting between the Secretary of State for Business and the Bank Chief Executives got News Coverage by the Mass Media that coincided with Technology Assessment Appointments and Technology Assessment Postponements by the Bank Officers.
  13. The Equity Lawyer used the Case Management Coincidences for investigations that discovered Source Code Theft was the Case Management Priority of Barclays Bank.   The Theft Plan filed. The European Leaders made a Market Exclusion Fraud Plan against the Signature Analysis Technology. It denied Market Access to the State and City. State Officers wanted to use Advanced Electronic Signatures for Governance Efficiency. Bankers and Insurers wanted to use it to develop Market Services and make Huge Profits. All of them discovered Powerful Anonymous Parties prevented Governance Efficiency and Market Services. Market Investigations by the Equity Lawyer discovered Exclusion Frauds.
  14. The Writing Analysis Technology got the World Lead for Advanced Electronic Signatures for the British People. It enabled them to develop Enormous Markets for Sophisticated Services at Value Prices. The Source Code Theft Plan and Market Exclusion Fraud Plan was an Opportunity Sabotage Fraud by Prime Minister Mr Blair and the Source Code Theft Conspirators against the British People and Everyone Else.
  15. The Equity Lawyer prepared to service the Advanced Electronic Signature Market when the Market Exclusion Frauds ended.
  16. The Business Defence Plan needed a Reverse Engineering Deterrent and Source Code Theft Deterrent. The Geneva Inventions Exhibition Gold Medal was Originality Proof for the Signature Analysis Technology. It served the Deterrent Purposes.
  17. The Busines Defence Plan needed either the Source Code Theft Conspiracy Proof of a Theft Conspiracy Admission or Investigation Findings or Investigation Fraud Proof. The Source Code Theft Complaint by the Equity Lawyer got Investigation Fraud Proof for the Equity Lawyer against Bank Officers. He used it to get a Theft Conspiracy Admission by a Law Firm for the Group Board. He knew use of the Theft Conspiracy Admission for Legal Action in the British Law Courts would have been used for Court Frauds and Costs Frauds and Bankruptcy Frauds to get the Source Code. He kept the Originality Proof of the Gold Medal and the Theft Conspiracy Admission for USA Jurors. Whoever got the Advanced Electronic Signature Market needed the USA Market.
  18. The Signing Behaviour Analysis Technology was Concept Proof in the Public Domain. It gave confidence for Body Movement Analysis Technology that got Mass Publicity using Thriller Films years earlier than would have been the case because the Concept Proof was in the Public Domain.
  19. The Market Exclusion Frauds created a Priming Business Dependency on Small Independents. Many Small Independents had Business Ideas that needed Advanced Electronic Signatures. All of them were dependent on someone providing the Priming Demand, The Equity Lawyer helped many of them to explore the possibilities for them to provide the Priming Demand.
  20. In 2002 a Bank IT Expert began developing the Internet Technology for Document Management.
  21. In 2003 a Car Mechanic changed his business with intent to get Fleet Management Contracts to provide the Priming Demand. It needed On-Line Services that used Vehicle Data for Parts Weighted Opinions and Labour Weighted Opinions and Writing Analysis Identification of the Relevant Expert for Quality Control Purposes. It gave Fleet Managers in remote and dangerous places the choice of Rapid Repair using the Parts Weighted Opinion or Staff Training using the Labour Weighted Opinion. The Car Mechanic needed to recruit Competent Independents as Vehicle Data Analysis Experts. They used Vehicle Data Technology. The Car Mechanic got Marketing Rights for the Vehicle Data Technology because the Technology Sales identified the Competent Independents.
  22. The British State made an Espionage Plan. It needed the Patent Rights in 18 European States for the use of Vehicle Data for Insurance Premiums, develop New Technology than linked Vehicle Data to Location Data and use Diplomatic Car Traffic Analysis for Live Espionage against Sovereign States and UK Car Traffic Analysis for All Purposes against the British Citizen.  Norwich Union serviced the Espionage Plan, bought the Patent Rights, and gave a New Technology Development Contract to IBM.  It was a Doom Plan. It needed Status Publicity for Top Managers as Insurance Business Managers and Anonymity Frauds for them as Espionage Plan Managers.
  23. In late 2003 two things coincided. The Document Management System reached the Testing Stage.  A Ping Test revealed the distance between the Test Terminals was 5 kilometres. Norwich Union took delivery of the New Vehicle Technology. They knew how to interpret the Location Data but not the Activity Data. They asked the Car Mechanic to attend a Business Meeting. He asked the Equity Lawyer to attend. The Technology Development Team asked for help with Vehicle Activity Data Analysis. It got Deal Proposals for the Data Analysis in exchange for Insurance Products that used Advanced Electronic Signatures. The Technology Development Team did not have Negotiation Authority. They called for the Top Manager. He entered the room. The Team Leader did not know the Top Manager needed an Anonymity Fraud because the Equity Lawyer would discover the espionage Plan. The Team Leader attempted a Polite Introduction that identified the Top Manager and explained the High Status. It got Introduction Sabotage Behaviour from the Top Manager. The Equity Lawyer noticed. He knew what it meant. He explained to the Team Leader everything he wanted the Top Manager to know. It did not take long. New Markets need Consumer Confidence. The Vehicle Data Insurance Plan needed the Policy Holder to have Data Security and the elimination of Location Data to prevent Motoring Convictions by the State. Old Technology did not have Location data and was about 1/8th the price. The Deal Proposal was the exchange of Data Analysis for Insurance Products using Advanced Electronic Signatures. The Top Manager acknowledged it. There was a Brief Exchange between the Equity Lawyer and Top Manager. The Equity Lawyer explained the Insurance Plan could do Confidence Damage that affected Consumer Confidence in Other Markets. It was a Thursday afternoon.
  24. It got Rapid Termination of the Business Meeting, a Hurried Removal of the Car Mechanic and Equity Lawyer from the Building, Frantic Communications between Norwich Union and Progressive Insurance in Texas, a Business Meeting Appointment for the Monday Morning with a Technology Manufacturer in California and Transport Arrangements from Texas to California for a Progressive Insurance Team to attend the Business Meeting. A Production Manager realised what was happening, telephoned the Car Mechanic, and passed a message to the Business Owner not to do business with Progressive Insurance until he had spoken with the Car Mechanic.
  25. It got a Service Interruption by Docklands Telephone Exchange while the Secret Service installed an Electronic Eavesdropping Loop and Viewing Station to observe the Document Management Tests. The choice for them was Intercept, Run and Resend with a Half Second Delay or Intercept, Resend and Run with No Delay. They chose the Delay option. The Bank IT Expert noticed the delay. A Ping Test discovered the Telephone Exchange Works had increased the distance between the Test Terminals from 5 to 7 kilometres.  The Bank IT Expert it was Electronic Eavesdropping by the Secret Service. He carried on. All Tests got Success Results.  The Secret Service reported to Prime Minister Mr Blair.
  26. In early 2004 the Car Mechanic got acceptance by the Local Managers of the Angolan Fleet. The Equity Lawyer helped him get acceptance by the London Managers. It got a Fleet Management Contact for the Car Mechanic. It got Priming Demand for the Signature Analysis Technology. It got Business Credibility that enabled a Garage Manager in Luanda to make Business Introductions. The Garage Owner was wealthy and well connected. He heard about the Business Introductions, asked questions and then asked for a Business Meeting. Every year the Garage Owner spent his Birthday Week in Lisbon so that he could visit relatives.  The Car Mechanic made a Meeting Appointment for Lisbon so that the Equity Lawyer and his Dutch Distribution Manager could attend.  It got a Business Agreement. A Payment Cheque from the Garage Owner to the Dutch Distribution Manager evidenced the Business Agreement. The Secret Service made a Business Progress Report to Prime Minister Mr Blair.
  27. The Business Progress made inevitable the exposure of the Dictator Power Concealment Frauds and Election Frauds. Extradition Frauds and Imprisonment Frauds against a Business Manager who was a British Citizen and Business Manager who was a Dutch Citizen. Everything that could go wrong for them did go wrong.  The 1st Extradition Fraud discovered the use of Kent Ports for Drug Trafficking by Top Police, Top Customs and Top Judges were the Top Drug Dealers.
  28. An Extradition Fraud Deal required completion of the Innocence Evidence Concealment Frauds by the British Authorities before completion of the Imprisonment Frauds by the British Authorities.
  29. A Protection Fraud Deal got Immunity Frauds for the Top Drug Dealers in exchange for service of the Extradition Frauds and a Profit Share for Prime Minister Mr Blair at the expense of the Top Judges.
  30. The Extradition Fraud Proof was used for a Corruption Notice to the Crown and Parliament. It ended the Dormancy Period and revived use of the Equity Monarchy Trusts. It started a Corruption Remedy Process that has continued ever since.
  31. The Corruption Remedy Process used Parliament Session Agreements between the Crown and Prime Ministers to impose Corruption Remedy Conditions that required:
    1. the Binding Precedent for:
      1. Validity Priority using the 2008 House of Lords Case R v Clarke
      2. Fraud Invalidity using the 2015 Case Sharland v Sharland
      3. Justice Office Conflict Disqualification using the 2015 Case Emerald Supplies v British
    2. the Corruption Case Issue Right for the Citizen against the High Court and Court of Appeal evidenced by the Before Issue Approval Powers Revocation Order in 2015
    3. the Special Protection of a Legal Service Crime Prosecution Prohibitions for Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis against the State
  32. The Legal Service Crime Prosecution Prohibition Special Protection enabled the Equity Lawyer to provide Case Management Services and use Corruption Cases of Citizens for Integrity Tests of the State and Law Courts.  
  33. The Integrity Test Cases forced Corrupt Officers to choose between:
    1. Conflict Disqualification Admissions that enabled Adjudication Justice by Credibly Neutral Justice Officers
    2. Conflict Qualification Frauds needed to get the Case Control, Pending Adjudication Enforcement Stay Protection Breach Contempt Frauds, Dismissal Frauds and Restraint Frauds against Citizens
  34. The Top Judges used a Business Development Plan to make up for the Lost Profit Share. It needed Protection Frauds that enabled Insurers and Surveyors who managed Land Frauds for Big Land Owners against Small Independents.  Top Judges were jealous of the Huge Profits that Lease Forfeitures Frauds got for Landlords. They formed Asset Theft Partnerships with Organised Criminals, Representatives and State Officers. They committed Asset Thefts against Citizens and the State.  The Remedy Process used some of the Corruption Proof got by the Business Expansion Plan.
  35. The Remedy Process Integrity Tests motivated the Corrupt Officers to demand Protection Frauds from Corrupt Superiors and to use Record Frauds, Case Misrepresentation Frauds and Identity Misrepresentation Frauds as Protection Frauds for Corrupt Witnesses, Corrupt Investigators, Corrupt Prosecutors, Corrupt Defenders, Corrupt Case Judges and Corrupt Supervision Judges.
  36. The Special Protection for the Equity Lawyer forced Top Judges f Civil Court Contempt Powers to provide Protection Frauds for Organised Criminals, Corrupt Representatives and Corrupt Officers. The Record Frauds created the need for Audio Records that are Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals
  37. The Parliament Session Agreement in December 2019 between the Crown and Prime Minister required that a Royal Commission deliver Corruption Remedies before the Session End. The Default Penalty is a Parliament Session Refusal and Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof and Remedy Denial Fraud Proof. Corruption Remedies needed Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof against Organised Criminals, State Officers and Law Court Judges including Lord Justices of the Court of Appeal.
  38. The Equity Lawyer provided Case Management Services that got the Protection Fraud Conspiracy Proof for Citizens, Parliament and the Crown. Organised Criminals, Corrupt Representatives and Corrupt Officers demanded Protection Frauds. They were given the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 and General Civil Restraint Renewal Fraud against the Equity Lawyer. It got Court Audio Records that were Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals. The Equity Lawyer used it for the 1st Contempt Fraud Appeal 2020 0396. It got Pending Appeal Trial Stay Protection Rights for the Equity Lawyer against the State and High Court.
  39. The Restraint Breach Imprisonment Trial Permission Fraud and the Trial Permission Fraud were Trial Stay Protection Breach Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Proof for the Equity Lawyer, Parliament and Crown against the State and High Court.
  40. The Equity Lawyer used the Trial Permission Fraud for the 2nd Contempt Fraud Appeal.
  41. The 1st Contempt Fraud Appeal Dismissal Fraud and the 2nd Contempt Fraud Appeal Issue Denial Fraud added Trial Stay Protect Breach Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Proof against Case Judges and Supervising Judges of the Court of Appeal.
  42. The Restraint Breach Imprisonment Trial on 3rd November 2020 got Status Conflict Recusal Refusal Fraud Proof, Trial Start Fraud Proof, Trial Directions Fraud Proof and Trial Fraud Conspiracy Proof for the Equity Lawyer, Parliament and Crown against the State and Trial Judge Mr Jay. On 19th July 2016 Trial Judge Mr Jay sat in Royal Court 37 and use Hearing Judge Status in Corruption Cases of Citizens to get Witness Status, Investigator Status and Prosecutor Status in the Restraint Breach Contempt Prosecution Fraud against the Equity Lawyer. It was Status Disqualification Proof against him. The Trial Fraud got an Audio Record of Event Admissions, Status Admissions and Conflict Disqualification Denials by Trial Judge Mr Jay. They are Conflict Qualification Fraud Conspiracy Proof against State Counsel Mr Eardley and Trial Judge.
  43. The Remedy Process waited two days the Records Fraud Signature from Trial Judge Mr Jay and the Record Fraud Seal from Court Officers, and on the 3rd day, gave him a Conflict Disqualification Notice and Recusal Demand. It got the Forced Recusal Judgement dated 9th November 2020, and the Forced Recusal and Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud dated 9th November 2020 and the Conflict Recusal Article in the Law Society Gazette.
  44. The Equity Lawyer used the Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Directions Fraud for the 3rd Contempt Fraud Appeal and the Recusal, and Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud for the 4th Trial Fraud Appeal to the Court of Appeal and all of it for a Remedy Application in the High Court. On-Line Applications got Help With Fee Documents. Royal Mail Signed-For Post got a Receipt Signature for Both Appeals and the Remedy Application from the Royal Courts Post Room. All of it got Automatic Issue Denial Fraud Proof against the Court of Appeal and Application Process denial fraud Proof against the High Court and Fee Remission Certificate Denial Fraud Proof against the Fees Office.
  45. The 2nd Contempt Fraud Appeal got Issue Denial Frauds for 173 days, and Appeal Issue on Saturday 12th November 2020 with Email Notice.
  46. The Adjourned Trial on Monday 14th November 2020 got a Conflict Disqualification Recusal Refusal Fraud Conspiracy Proof, Pending Appeal Trial Stay Protection Breach Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Proof, Liability Trial Fraud Proof, Multiple Trial Fraud Proof and 2 Day Adjournment Fraud Proof and then on Wednesday 16th November 2020 Liability Trial Finding Fraud Proof and Penalty Adjournment Fraud Proof for the Equity Lawyer, Parliament and Crown against State Counsel Mr Eardley and Trial Judge Mrs Cutts.
  47. The Contempt Trial frauds were Fraud Commitment Proof from the High Court that got Fraud Commitment Proof by Organised Criminals, Lower Courts and State Officers that got the 2nd Appeal Dismissal Fraud by the Court of Appeal.
  48. The Fraud Commitment Proof included a Mortgage Repayment Receipt Refusal Notice dated 16th December 2020 from the Bank of Scotland. It was Land Fraud Conspiracy Proof for the Citizen Trust Beneficiary Mr Sood, Parliament and the Crown against the Family Estate Trustee, Representatives, the Bank and the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal.
  49. The Fraud Commitment Proof included a Sex Crime Investigation Fraud and Arrest Fraud on 21st December 2020 by Sussex Police against Citizen Mr Taylor.
  50. The Equity Lawyer used the Recusal Refusal Fraud + Contempt Liability Trial Fraud for the 5th Contempt Fraud Appeal and Advance Notice that the Penalty Hearing will get a 6th Contempt Fraud Appeal.
  51. The Top Judges were trapped. They use Career Blackmail Frauds against Qualified Lawyers to get Preliminary Issue Appeal Denial Frauds against Citizens and use Trial Completion Fraud Appeals for Delay Frauds until the completion of Enforcement Frauds, and then Dismissal Frauds, that sometimes use the Enforcement Completion for Pointless Case Comments.  The Equity Lawyer filed 4 Contempt Fraud Appeals enabled the 1st got Dismissal Fraud Conspiracy Proof against Court Officers, Case Judges and Supervising Judges of the Court of Appeal. The 2nd Fraud Appeal got Issue Denial Fraud Proof for 173 days, and then a Dismissal Fraud by a Lord Justice that was Protection Fraud Proof. The 3rd and 4th Fraud Appeals got Issue Denial Fraud Proof, and Filing Deficit Pretence Frauds, use of the Forced Recusal for a Pointless Case Pretence Fraud. The Deficit Pretence Fraud Complaint and Repeat Filing got a Repeat Pointless Case Pretence Fraud, 7 Day Compliance Time Limit and Dismissal Threat.
  52. Citizen Cases continued to get Fraud Conspiracy Proof. Investigation is needed to discover whether they were part of the Protection Fraud Deal or another Protection Fraud Deal.
  53. Additional Fraud Proof Filing Rights Reserved for the Equity Lawyer.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

Royal Commission, 2020 000286, 2020 0396, 2069, PI 10063 and Lease Claim F02ED793 Evidence Request Immunity Negotiation Offer

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers, Law Court Judges and Organised Criminals

Contempt and Terrorism Penalty Warning in the event of a Response Failure to the attached 2020 000286 Immunity Negotiation Offer dated 11th January 2021 is from the Equity Lawyer to the Owners and Directors of Eatsnow Estates Limited. At 18.20 on 12th January 2021, Citizens Mr Hastunc and Mr Can Say effected Personal Service of it by delivery to Mr Deiz Beyzhet at Gokyuzu Restaurant, The Fairways, Southend Road, Chingford, London, E4 8TA because the Landlord owned it and had Office Space. Later it got a Service Delivery from Gokyuzu Restaurant who denied having any Service Receipt Obligation to the Landlord.

On 18th January 2021 there was Repeat Telephone Contact from the Landlord that make Repeat Possession Demand Frauds rely on Possession Order Service Denial Frauds by the County Court. The Landlord did not admit knowledge of the Immunity Negotiation Offer. The Citizen Tenant referred the Landlord to the Landlord’s Lawyers.

All of it is Relevant Evidence and New Corruption Evidence for the New Evidence Case Reopening Applications of the Equity Lawyer in the High Court and Court of Appeal.

The Protection Fraud Market starts with the Absolute Advantage of Business Refusal Powers for Suppliers against Customers. Sometimes, Repeat Business creates enough Transaction Proof that get a Business Refusal Power Loss for the Customer against the Provider. Sometimes, Protection Fraud Providers procure Violent Crime Services or Money Laundering Services from Customers that creates enough Transaction Proof to get a Business Refusal Power Loss.

The Remedy Process forced Organised Criminals and State Officers to demand Protection Frauds that cannot get Protection Refusals by Top Judges. The Worst Risk in the Protection Fraud Market is the Immunity Risk. Immunity Deal Risk was the Worst Risk for them. It is Immunity Deals for Organised Criminals and State Officers in exchange for Remedy Co-operation and Full Disclosure that gets Corruption Proof against Top Judges. The Protection Fraud Market deals with it by requiring Fraud Commitment Proof from Fraud Beneficiaries before the Protection Fraud Supply. Sometimes the Protection Fraud deal requires Protection Fraud Proof from a Lower Court to give confidence to provide the Fraud Commitment Proof needed to get the Protection Fraud Supply from the Higher Court.

Repeat Protection Fraud Business or Crime Services, or both, got Business Refusal Power Loss for the Owners and Directors of Eatsnow Estates Limited against Top Judges.

The Lease Claim Fraud F02ED793 got Criminal Conspiracy Proof for Citizen Mr Hastunc, Parliament and the Crown against the Owners and Directors of Eatsnow Estates Limited as Organised Criminals, Black Graff LLP as Legal Representatives and Law Court Judges. It includes Defence and Counterclaim Filing Denial Frauds, Costs, Trial Directions Appeal Filing Denial Frauds, Possession Denial Appeal Hearing Notice Denial Frauds, Possession Denial Appeal Hearing Denial Fraud and Possession Denial Appeal Hearing Result Service Denial Fraud that is an Appeal Sabotage Fraud. A Possession Fraud Enforcement Bluff by the Landlord failed to get a Possession Surrender from Citizen tenant Mr Hastunc.

On Thursday 7th January 2021 a Telephone Call from Black Graff LLP that gave Oral Notice of the Alleged Possession Order and a Vacant Possession Demand.

On Monday 11th January 2021 a Telephone Call and then at 13.14 a Text Message from 07983537172 for Eatsnow Estates Limited Director Mr Brendon to Citizen Mr Hastunc reads, “Eddie good to talk today The court ordered you move out within 14 days Pay outstanding rent £ 85720 costs of £10048.80 and £107.30 a day if not vacated. When you move out give the keys to John in The Container storage Give me a call and we can discuss settlement”.

On Monday 19th January 2021 the Citizen Tenant had the Repeat Telephone Contact from the Landlord.

It is Corruption Damage Proof for Lease Claim F02ED793 Defence Case of Citizen Mr Hastunc. It is New Fraud Proof for the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Liability Finding Revocation, Retrial, Case Dismissal and Contempt Fraud Liability Application and the 5 Fraud Appeals of Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis.

The Equity Lawyer will apply for an F02ED793 Court File Production Order against the Ministry of Justice.

The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 got 4 Preliminary Issue Fraud Appeals and a Liability Trial Fraud Appeal. On Monday 11th January 2021 the 1st Fraud Appeal Dismissal Fraud by Court Officers was used to get Fraud Responsibility Proof against Appeal Lord Justice Coulson.

The Equity Lawyer will use New Corruption Proof, including the Fraud Proof against Lord Justice Coulson, as New Corruption Proof for a 2020 000286 Contempt Liability Finding Revocation, Case Dismissal, Contempt Fraud Liability Order and Contempt Fraud Remedy Application against the Solicitor General.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2021-01-11-Claim-2020-000286-Fraud-Appeals-2021-PI-10036-Bias-Fraud-F02ED793-Immunity-Negotiation-Offer-to-Eatsnow-Estates-Limited-Service-Time-by-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

Royal Commission, 2020 000286, 2020 0396, 2069 and PI 10063

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Officers, and Law Court Judges

UK Judges need to know that the Corruption Remedy Process got Remedy Co-operation from USA Presidents Mr Obama and Mr Trump and is likely to get it from President Mr Biden.

The Best Advice for USA President Mr Biden is to use the Inauguration Event to start a Unification Debate, follow it up with Justice Commitments and the First 100 Days to deliver Justice Credibility Successes.

Speech Suggestions and Management Suggestions

Speech Suggestions
  1. Declare that he will take a political Risk
  2. Explain that the Political Risk is not starting Unification Debate but setting a High Intellectual Standard
  3. Explain that everyone can share the High Intellectual Standard provided they give it time and care
  4. Explain that Revolution Successes get Constitutional Arrangements that benefit the Revolution Victors
  5. Explain that the Glorious Revolution in 17th Century Britain and the American War of Independence and the French Revolution in the 18th Century got Constitutional Arrangements that benefitted the Revolution Victors
  6. Explain that it is time to examine how far the Constitutional Arrangements made in the 17th and 18th Centuries, and the Constitutional Amendments made in the 19th and 20th Centuries service the Justice Priority Obligation in the 21st Century
    1. The Glorious Revolution was to control the Dictator Mindset of a King that was a Civil War Risk for the 2nd Time in a 50 Year Period. It was a Revolution Success for Equity Lawyers. They wanted Stable Government. They made Constitutional Arrangements that gave Dominant Status to the Citizen that is subject to High Standard Controls. They managed it very cleverly. They vested Parliament Session Powers in the Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops. They used Jurisdiction Separation to vest Corruption Investigation Jurisdiction in the Citizen, Prosecution Jurisdiction in the Crown and Adjudication Jurisdiction in the Lord Bishops. They used 24 Lord Bishops so that up to 12 of them sit as Trial Jurors and up to 12 others sit as Appeal Jurors. They used the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard as a Quality Control. It is Official Records that are Justice Proof for Honourable Officers or Guilt Proof against Corrupt Officers and Credibility Irrelevance Proof for the Victim. It eliminates the need for Witness Attendances and Credibility Findings. It gives confidence that Trial Orders by the Crown will get Rapid Processing. It vested Citizen Accountability Powers in anyone who has the Intellectual Competence and Personal Confidence for Case Management that gets Proof Sets that meet the Corruption Remedy Proof Standard. It is not an Elitist Standard. It is a Justice Standard.
    2. Citizen Empowerment got by the Glorious Revolution influenced the Independence Aspirations of the American Colonies. It motivated the American War of Independence. The Commercial Executive resourced the Colonial Forces with Money and Talent. The Constitutional Arrangements had the effect of vesting in the Commercial Executive the Accountability Powers needed to control the State Executive.
    3. The French Revolution went through a Chaotic Period. It got General Acceptance of Dictator Governance by the Commercial Executive. The Constitutional Arrangements of the Code Napoleon enabled the Commercial Executive to provide Economic Support for Dictator Governance and denied Accountability Powers that Journalists, Politicians and Lawyers needed to stop the use of the Dictator Governance for Napoleonic Wars.
    4. The European Constitution was based on the Napoleonic Code. It vested Dictator Powers in the State. It got Constitutional Acceptance by Many Governors, Constitutional Rejection from Many Voters and an Enormous Rift between Governors and Governed.
    5. The European Constitution got Referenda Rejection by the French, Dutch, Irish and British. It did not get Constitutional Change for the French, Dutch and Irish. It did get Sovereign Independence for the British.
  7. The United States has Similar Divisions to those in the European Union.
  8. It is time for a Unification Debate.
  9. It is time to consider the need for Citizen Empowerment will Performance Quality Controls.
  10. This is not a Political Issue between Political Parties. It is a Governance Issue between Governors and Governed. It needs everyone to invest time and care achieving the High Intellectual Standard the Unification Issue deserves.
Management Suggestions
  1. Make the Unification Speech using the Remedy Proposal for Citizen Empowerment subject to Performance Quality Controls is a Remedy Proposal by the President that challenges everyone else to make Debate Contributions
  2. Get Media Publicity for Constitutional Change Conflicts in Other Sovereign States  
  3. Get Media Publicity for an Indian Constitutional Change Enquiry of the Indian President whether the Indian Law Commission made Constitutional Recommendations for Death Inquest Powers for Out of State Deaths and if so when and the progress made by the Indian Parliament
  4. Get Media Publicity for what the USA can learn from the Case Management of Constitutional Conflicts
  5. Get Media Publicity for Cross Party Collaboration by Senators and Representatives that addresses the Performance Quality Control and silences the Extremists
  6. Get Justice Credibility Proof within the First 100 Days

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

Royal Commission, Contempt Fraud Complaint against the House of CommonsSpeaker and Court of Appeal, 2021 PI 10069, YYYY and ZZZZ

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Officers, Law Court Judges and Law Court Judges

Contempt Fraud Complaint against the House of Commons Speaker

The Parliament Contempt Remedy Jurisdiction and the Session Hearing Jurisdiction get Justice Office Status and the Uncontested Seat Electoral Convention for the House of Commons Speaker. Royal Commission Emails to House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <Lindsay.hoyle.mp@parliament.uk> got Automatic Replies that claimed a Political Representation Jurisdiction for Constituents Only and referred All Others to the Email Address <speakersoffice@parliament.uk>. The Remedy Responsibility Acknowledgement Failure is Contempt Fraud Proof for the Citizen, Parliament, Crown and People against the House of Commons Speaker.

Contempt Fraud Complaint against the Royal Courts Fee Office and the Court of Appeal

  1. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Filing Acknowledgement 43 Day Delay Fraud, Conflict Disqualification Denial Contempt Fraud, Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit Denial Contempt Fraud, Master Identity Non-Disclosure Contempt Fraud, Appellant Notice Deficit Pretence Fraud and Repeat Filing Requirement Fraud

    The Recusal Refusal Fraud and Trial Fraud Appeal got a 43 Day Filing Acknowledgement Denial Fraud from the Sign For Post NY022186103GB Receipt on 24th November 2020 until the Acknowledgment + Reference 2021 PI 10063 Notice Email at 16.08 on 7th January 2021 from Administrative Officer Mr Peter Coburn that read

    ‘I acknowledge receipt of your papers, which this office received on 24.11.20. Your papers were referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you of the following: “If Mr Ellis is seeking to appeal an order in addition to the order of 3.11.20 he must file an appellant’s notice clearly showing the date of the order in section 2 and a copy of the order being appealed. The appellant notice in relation to the order of 3.11.20 will be issued.” Please quote 2021/PI/10063 in correspondence.’

    It is an Appellant Notice Deficit Pretence Fraud and Repeat Filing Requirement Fraud because the Appellant Notice disclosed in section 2 the Judge Identity of Justice Mr Jay and the Order Date of 3rd November 2020
  2. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Fraud Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Conflict Disqualification Denial Contempt Fraud, Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit Denial Contempt Fraud, Master Identity Non-Disclosure Fraud, Attempted Withdrawal Procurement Fraud and Response 7 Day Time Limit Fraud

    The Recusal Refusal Fraud and Trial Fraud Appeal Attempted Withdrawal Procurement Fraud Email at 14.57 on 8th January 2021 from Court of Appeal Officer Mr Yomi Oba that read

    Dear Sir/Madam, I acknowledge receipt of your papers, which this office received on 24.11.20 Your papers were referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you of the following: “Please confirm whether you still wish to pursue an application for permission to appeal from the order of Jay J dated 3/11/20 refusing to recuse himself. Jay J reconsidered his decision and the order of 9/11/20 confirms that Jay J did recuse himself.  An appeal from the order of 3/11/20, therefore, appears to be academic” You have 7 days from the date on this letter to reply. Please quote 2021/PI/10063 in correspondence.

    The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops managed a Corruption Remedy Process. It needed Corruption Investigations of the Law Courts using Investigation Services by Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis. Corrupt Officers lost confidence. They demanded Protection Frauds from Top Judges. They tried to defend themselves with Computer Record Frauds that were Case Misrepresentation Frauds and Identity Misrepresentation Frauds for Corrupt Officers, Corrupt Representatives and Corrupt Judges. It created the need for Audio Records that are Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals or Hearing Denial Fraud Proof that is Audio record Denial Proof. The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 was the lead Case for getting Audio Records.

    The Worst Risk in the Protection Fraud Market is that Corrupt Officers trade Remedy Co-operation that gets Protection Fraud Proof against Suppliers in exchange for Immunity Terms. Top Judges control the Immunity Risk by requiring Fraud Beneficiaries to provide Fraud Commitment Proof before the Protection Fraud Supply. The State Officers, State Counsel and Trial Judges demanded the Fraud Commitment Proof of Appeal Process Denial Frauds by the Court of Appeal before delivering the Prosecution Frauds. The Court of Appeal demanded Fraud Commitment Proof from Protection Fraud Beneficiaries before delivery of the Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 Dismissal Fraud. The Fraud Commitment Proof they got from Lower Court Judges was Case Frauds against Citizens who serviced the Remedy Process. The Fraud Commitment Proof they got from Sussex Police was a Sex Crime Investigation Fraud against Citizen Mr Taylor who had serviced the Remedy Process.

    The Remedy Process needed the Audio Records and Decision Proof before procuring the Forced Recusal. It got the Forced Recusal and Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud for the Trial Directions that were the Crime Proceeds of the Recusal Refusal Fraud.
  3. The Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Frauds on 14th, 16th and 18th December 2020 by Trial Judge Mrs Cutts got the 5th Fraud Appeal, Bundle Filing Email on 21st December 2020 by the Equity Lawyer and Automatic Acknowledgement Emails from the Court of Appeal and Appeal Process Denial Fraud Proof for the Equity Lawyer against the Court of Appeal    
  4. Fraud Appeal Fee Remission Process Denial Frauds by Fee Officers

    The Royal Commission, 5 Trial Fraud Appeal and Fraud Appeals x 5 Bundle Filing Email on 21st December 2020 got the Automatic Response Emails from the Court of Appeal and the Fees Office using Fees (RCJ) at 17 02 on 22nd December 2020 that reads, ‘Thank you for your email. If your query is in relation to Help With Fees, please ensure you have provided your HWF reference, a copy of the document you are applying for Help with Fees for, which Division the application is for and the court fee you would be paying. Any request that does not comply with this will not be processed. For other Fees queries, we aim to respond within to emails within 3-5 working days.’

    The 5th Fraud Appeal got No Further Response from the Fees Office and No Substantive Filing Acknowledgement by the Court of Appeal.

    The Royal Commission Email on 6th January 2021 made Remedy Proposals and gave Reasons that explained the Protection Fraud Criminal Conspiracy by Top Judges. It got the Irrelevance Notice Response Email at 09.39 on 7th January 2021 from Fee Administration Officer Mr Stuart Dabbs that reads ‘Dear Sirs, Upon checking the contents of this email I am unable to find anything that would explain why it has been sent to the fees office. Unless you have specific requests of the fees office please refrain from sending us emails that do not concern us.’

    A Contempt Fraud Investigation is needed to discover whether Fee Officers received Process Denial Fraud Orders and that the True Intent of the Irrelevance Notice Response Email was a Process Acknowledgment that they dare not make in any other way

Special Request for Fee Remission Services for the 5th Fraud Appeal

Remedy Proposal for

  1. Restraint Renewal Fraud Appeal 2020 0396 Dismissal Contempt Fraud Admissions, Contempt Fraud Dismissal Revocation, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order ad Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Directions 1 Hour Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
  2. Restraint Breach Prosecution Permission Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 Dismissal Fraud Contempt Admissions, Contempt Fraud Dismissal Revocation Decisions, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Remedy 1 Hour Hearing Order for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
  3. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Start Fraud, Trial Adjournment Directions Fraud dated 3rd November 2019 Appeal 2021 PI 10063 Filing Acknowledgment 43 Day Delay Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
  4. Recusal, Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud dated 9th November 2019 Appeal Filing Acknowledgment 43 Day Delay Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General
  5. Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Frauds dated 14th and 16th and 18th December 2020 Appeal Filing Acknowledgment Denial Contempt Fraud Admission, Issue Order, Appeal Permission, Appeal Regulation Enforcement Prohibition Order, Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Liability Order, Remedy Entitlement Order and Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Remedy Hearing Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the Solicitor General

Without Prejudice to Invalidity Arguments Repeat Filing of the Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Directions Fraud Appellant Notice and Recusal Trial Directions Confirmation Fraud Appellant Notice 

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-11-16-Contempt-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-2020-XXXX-Recusal-Refusal-Trial-Directions-Fraud-Appellant-Notice-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General-n161-eng

2020-11-16-Contempt-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-2020-YYYY-Recusal-Trial-Directions-Confirmation-Fraud-Appellant-Notice-of-Equity-Lawyer-Mr-Ellis-v-Solicitor-General-n161-eng-