Royal Commission, Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286, Polite Notices and Request, and Reasonable Suspicions Notice

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers, Law Court Judges and Journalist Mr Rozenberg

Polite Notice to Journalist Mr Rozenberg that the Royal Commission Emails give Citizen Case Papers to the Cabinet and Parliament at the same time as they are served on the State or filed in the Law Courts. It enables Honourable Parliamentarians to conduct Corruption Investigations and discover what the State and Law Courts did with them. It is Totally Predictable that Corrupt Officers commit Evidence Destruction Frauds and Computer Record Frauds.

Polite Notice to Journalist Mr Rozenberg that Citizen Papers in the Corruption Remedy Process use the Citizen Oriented Style. The Familiar Phrases are identified by Capital Letters. Use of the 3rd Person eliminates the need for Jurors to convert the 1st and 2nd Person into the 3rd Person in Jury Discussions. The Familiar Phrases and use of the 3rd Person assist Jury Findings by Lord Bishop Jurors in Parliament Courts and Lay Jurors in Law Courts.

Polite Request to Journalist Mr Rozenberg for Trial Misconduct Evidence against 2020 000286 Trial Judge Mr Jay for the Stated Reasons that Trial Misconduct Article of the Journalist appeared on 15th June 2020 in the Law Society Gazette and there are Reasons Suspicions of a Fall-Guy Conspiracy against Trial Judge Mr Jay by Corrupt Parliamentarians and Appeal Lord Justices who are Investigation Targets in the Corruption Remedy Process.

Fall-Guy Conspiracy Reasonable Suspicion Notice and Remedy-Only Jurisdiction Limit Acknowledgment from Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis to 2020 000286 High Court Mr Jay

  1. Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Recusal Refusal and Trial Direction Orders dated 3rd November 2020 were followed by the Recusal and Direction Confirmation Order dated 9th November 2020 by Trial Judge Jay. The Conflict Recusal was valid. The Trial Confirmation Orders are invalid. Justice Mr Jay has a Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit for the Equity Lawyer against the State and Remedy Advice from the Equity Lawyer to use it.
  2. The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops have Justice Responsibilities known as the Equity Monarchy Trusts. They have Corruption Control Jurisdictions that govern Parliament Session Powers. They were dormant for 45 years. In 2004 Prime Minister Mr Blair joined a Criminal Conspiracy by European Leaders to commit Referenda Election Frauds. It got Fraud Proof Sets and use of them to revive the Equity Monarchy Trusts. It got a Corruption Remedy Process that has continued ever since.
  3. The Parliament Session Agreement in December 2019 between the Crown and Prime Minister required that a Royal Commission get Corruption Remedies before the Session End. The Default Penalty is a Parliament Session Refusal and Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof and Remedy Denial Fraud Proof. On 19th December 2019, the Queen announced it in the Parliament Session Opening Speech.
  4. Honourable Parliamentarians needed Criminal Conspiracy Proof to silence Corrupt Parliamentarians until Unfitness Cases got Corruption Findings and Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges. Citizens got it.
  5. Corrupt Officers tried to defend themselves by use of Evidence Destruction and Computer Record Frauds that are Forgery Proof and Perjury Proof against the Law Courts and the Ministry of Justice. It created the need for Audio Records that are Personal Responsibility Proof against Identifiable Individuals.
  6. Citizens had Corruption Cases with Hearing Events. Most of them lacked the Management Capacity to cope with Hearing Frauds Conspiracies by Qualified Lawyers and Law Court Judges. The case of Equity Lawyer Mr Edward William Ellis was an exception. He provided Investigation Services for the Crown and Lord Bishops. The Protection Fraud Network needed Protection Frauds to reassure Corrupt Officers they were safe. The planned to do it by use of the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 for an Imprisonment Fraud against the Equity Lawyer. He planned use of it to get Audio Records of Trial Frauds by the State Representatives and Trial Judges.
  7. Corrupt Parliamentarians and Appeal Lord Justices made a Damage Limitation Plan for themselves. It needed a Fall-Guy Conspiracy against a Lower Rank Judge. High Court Justice Mr Jay was excellent for the purpose.
    1. On 19th July High Court Justice Mr Jay sat for Short Notice Hearings of Restraint Applications by the State against Citizens. He reassured himself that he had Statutory Immunity for Court Frauds by referring to a Justice Act in the 1940’s. It was a Protection Fraud by Parliament for the State against War Damage Victims. Hearing Judge Jay used the Public Gallery Witness Status of Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis for a Restraint Breach Investigation Order Fraud against him. It used a Party Status Denial Fraud, Notice Denial Fraud, Hearing Denial Fraud and Jurisdiction Usurpation Fraud. It got Contempt Claim Frauds and General Civil Restraint Frauds and the Restraint Breach Imprisonment Committal Trial. The Crown and Lord Bishops issued Case Management Orders that enabled each stage of the case to service Corruption Investigations of the Law Courts for the Remedy Process. The result was a 4 year and 4 months’ delay between the Investigation Fraud and the Trial Fraud.
    2. His Intelligence and Self Defence Capacity were Totally Compromised by Arrogance and Dishonesty.
  8. The Set-Up Conditions needed:
    1. Reliance on the Equity Lawyer to use the Trial Fraud to get Proof Sets for the Unfitness Case
    2. Trial Misconduct Findings in the Defamation Trial Fraud Appeal Judgment in the case of Polish Claimant Mr Serafin v Polish Editor Mr Malkiewicz
    3. Profession Press Publicity for the Trial Misconduct Findings in an article by Journalist Mr Joshua Rozenberg on the Law Society Gazette
    4. Repeat Protection Breach Contempt Fraud and Trial Listing Fraud
    5. Conflict Qualification Fraud to get the Trial Allocation Fraud to Justice Mr Jay
    6. Trial Bundle Omission Frauds by the State Lawyers of Relevant Evidence created between June and November 2020
    7. Forgery and Perjury Allegation Frauds by the State Advocate against the Receipt Stamps given by the Sussex Crown Prosecutors when acting as Receiving Agent of Official Records for the Parliament Session File kept by the Director of Public Prosecutions held on trust for the Prime Minister to give the Crown when needed for Parliament Session Decisions.
    8. Contempt Immunity Frauds by Justice Mr Jay for the State Lawyers and the State Advocate
    9. Use of the Parliament Session File in Parliament for a Misrepresentation Fraud Finding and Contempt Fraud Finding against the State Advocate
    10. Use of the Contempt Fraud Finding for a Contempt Immunity Fraud Finding against Trial Judge Mr Jay

All of it was a Sabotage Fraud against the Remedy Process. The Sabotage Remedy needs a Conspiracy Warning and Remedy Proposal by the Equity Lawyer that gives Trial Judge Mr Jay the choice of creating Damage Mitigation Proof for himself or creating Aggravated Contempt Fraud Proof against himself by failing to do so.

  1. Use the Validity Presumption for the Equity Lawyer to require Rebuttal Proof from the State.
  2. Use the Validity Presumption and Bundle Omission Fraud Allegations by the Equity Lawyer for an Evidence Audit Order against the State.
  3. Use a Polite Request for Audit Assistance by the House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet and Privy Councillors.
  4. Use the Validity Presumption and Crown Prosecution Service Receipt Stamps on Citizen Papers and the Stamp Forgery Representations by the State Advocate for a Rebuttal Proof Disclosure Order against the State Representatives and State Advocate.
  5. Use the Validity Presumption and Health Fraud Allegations by the Equity Lawyer for a Medical Records production Order against NHS Trusts and Ministry of Health.
  6. Use the Fraud Appeals for a Superior Jurisdiction Protection Admission and Remedy Only Jurisdiction Limit Admission and Contempt Case Reference to the Court of Appeal.
  7. The Case Reference to the Court of Appeal will give Appeal Lord Justices the choice of creating Damage Mitigation Proof for themselves or creating Aggravated Contempt Fraud Proof against themselves.
  8. The Damage Mitigation Proof requires Full Disclosure who in Parliament provided Protection Frauds.
  9. The Remedy Process needs a Settlement Negotiation Meeting between the Equity Lawyer, Cabinet and Prime Minister to decide what to do with the Damage Mitigation Proof or the Aggravated Contempt Fraud Proof.

The Contempt 2020 000286 Trial Directions Order dated 3rd November 2020 evidences the Refusal Decisions against the Remedy Proposals dated 31st October 2020 but omits the Medical Records Production Refusal. The Proposals and Orders dated 3rd and 9th November 2020 are attached.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-10-31-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Remedy-Proposals-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General-1

2020-11-03-Contemp-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Commital-Trial-Adjournment-Direction-Orders-in-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-11-09-Contempt-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Recusal-Order-of-Trial-Judge-Mr-Jay-in-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

Royal Commission, Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 and B01B0837

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councilors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Trial Adjournment Order Amendment Demand for the Stated Reason it omits the Medical Records Production Refusal for the Ministry of Health and Mid Sussex Hospital Trust against the Equity Lawyer. The Admissions, Findings and Order Applications detailed in the Proposals dated 31st October 2020 included Party Status and Profession Unfitness Investigation Orders for the Equity Lawyer against the General Medical Council to remedy the Health Frauds committed by Top Doctors. They got Refusal Decisions by the Trial Judge who then gave Medical Evidence Filing Permission. It required the Equity Lawyer to ask the Top Doctors who committed the Health Frauds for Medical Opinions. The Equity Lawyer asked for a Medical Evidence Production Order against the Ministry of Health and Mid Sussex Hospital Authority because it evidenced the Medical Frauds and the Treatment Needs. The Medical Frauds included a Secret Diagnosis Fraud and Prescription Fraud to get Urea Retention Side effects that were a Urea Poison Fraud and a Dialysis Treatment Sabotage Fraud.  Drug Questions got Embarrassed Behaviour by the Drugs Nurse and a Case Reference to Renal Doctors. They could not explain the Urea Poison Fraud. They lacked the confidence for a Forced Medication Fraud. The Medical Records and Drug Audit Records prove it.  The Trial Order includes the Medical Evidence Filing Permission but omits the Medical Records Access Denial Fraud.

Adjourned Trial Date and Time Limit Change Possibility Notice to the High Court. The Evidence Balance starts with a Validity Presumption for the Citizen subject to Rebuttal Proof from the State. The Adjournment Application by the Equity Lawyer used a Tiredness Reason. The State did not offer Rebuttal Proof. The Trial Judge did not ask for Rebuttal Proof. and made a Doubt Finding against the Equity Lawyer and a Doubt Benefit Finding for the Equity Lawyer. They were Evidence Frauds and Finding Frauds. Less than 24 hours later the Renal Team used the  Dialysis Session on 4th November 2020 to inform Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis that the Blood Test Results merit an increase from 2 to 3 Dialysis Sessions a week. He said that they had not allowed him access to the Blood Test Results or disclosed High Toxin Results and thereby delayed Diet Changes by him. He explained that he implemented Diet Changes as soon as he knew about the High Toxin Results. They agreed to New Tests to discover whether the Diet Changes were good enough for 2 Sessions a week.

Citizen Father Mr Sood has Limited English Language and Case Management Incapacity to cope with a Criminal Conspiracy by his Son and Law Court Judges for Incapacity Exploitation Frauds and Hearing Frauds. He filed and served Draft Orders that explained his case. He did not participate in the Telephone Hearing on 23rd October 2020. It got a Pending Superior Adjudication Adjudication Enforcement Stay Protection Refusal by the County Court. The Fraud Appeals got Appeal Jurisdiction Denials by the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal and County Court claimed the High Court has Appeal Jurisdiction. The High Court used Participation Failure in the Telephone Hearing for an Appeal Denial Fraud. It forced a Set Aside Application in the County Court. All of it is Criminal Conspiracy Proof and Pending Adjudication Protection Denial Fraud Proof against the Officers and Judges of the Law Courts. Honourable Parliamentarians can ask Prime Minister Mr Johnson to explain what he did to procure Fraud Beneficiary Status in the High Court Corruption Claim and Court of Appeal Fraud Appeal.

Citizen Mr Sood will please file the attached  Set Aside Application Notice and Draft Orders.

Honourable Parliamentarians will please ask the Fraud Beneficiary Status Questions.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-11-05-Royal-Commission-Trust-Claim-Fraud-B01B0837-Remedy-Application-Notice-of-Citizen-Father-Mr-Sood-v-Trustee-Son-Mr-Sood

2020-11-05-Royal-Commission-B01B0837-Protection-Enforcement-Corruption-Remedy-DRAFT-Order-of-Citizen-Father-Mr-Sood-v-Son-Mr-Sood

2020-11-03-Contemp-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Commital-Trial-Adjournment-Other-Orders-in-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

Royal Commission, Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286, Fraud Appeals 2020 0396, PI10942 and 3rd Fraud Appeal

House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

On 3rd November 2020, High Court Justice Mr Jay said he intended to approve the Trial Order Frauds within 48 hours. 

High Court officers have a duty to bring the attached Fraud Appeal Draft Grounds to his attention so that he can consider use of Remedy Jurisdiction for Fraud Revocations.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis 

2020-11-04-Royal-Commission-Contempt-2020-000286-Trial-Fraud-Appeal-Grounds-Remedy-Proposals-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

Royal Commission, Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Remedy Proposals Service

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

Attached are the Royal Commission and Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Remedy Proposals dated 31st October 2020.

They include Polite Requests for Remedy Co-operation by the Cabinet and Prime Minister.

The dignity of Parliament needs and acknowledgement that MPs have serviced the Remedy Process. The Polite Request to the Right Honourable MPs Iain Duncan Smith, David Davis and Jacob Rees Mogg do that. There are others.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-10-31-Royal-Commission-Contempt-Claim-Fraud-2020-000286-Remedy-Proposals-of-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

Royal Commission, Court of Appeal 2020 0396 and PI 120942, High Court 2020 000286 Draft Orders Service and B01B0837 Appeal Grounds

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

Attached are:

  1. The High Court 2020 000286 Remedy Draft Orders dated 30th October 2020 of the Equity Lawyer for the Listed Trial on 3rd November 2020
  2. The Trust Fraud B01B0837 Remedy Application Dismissal Fraud Appeal Grounds dated 30th October 2020 of Citizen Mr Sood

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

2020-10-30-Royal-Commission-Court-of-Appeal-2020-0396-PI-120942-High-Court-2020-000286-Draft-Orders-in-Equity-Lawyer-v-Solicitor-General

2020-10-30-Royal-Commission-B01B00837-Remedy-Application-Dismissal-Appeal-Grounds-of-Citizen-Mr-Sood-v-Mr-Sood

Royal Commission, Court of Appeal 2020 0396, PI 120942, High Court 2020 000286, County Court B01B0837, F02ED793 and Fish Sale Investigation PFV6212DE Fraud Complaint

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minster, Cabinet Officers, Privy Councillors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

The Remedy Process needs Integrity Tests that get Corruption Remedies for the Citizen, Crown, Lord Bishops and Parliament or Hearing Audio Records that are Fraud Responsibility Proof against Top Judges.

In December 2019 the Corruption Remedy Process used Parliament Session Agreement between the Crown and Prime Minister to require Corruption Remedies before the Session End. Honourable Parliamentarians needed Criminal Conspiracy Proof to silence Corrupt Parliamentarians until Unfitness Cases got Corruption Findings and Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges. The Equity Lawyer and Citizens got it.

Top Judges used Case Issue Denial Frauds, Case Dismissal Frauds and Hearing Adjournment Frauds to avoid Hearing Audio Records of Citizens presenting the Criminal Conspiracy Proof.

The Fraud Appeal 2020 0396 Bundle Filing Time Extension Application by the Equity Lawyer got a Case Reference by the Case Officer to a Judge in the Court of Appeal. It vested Case Allocation Jurisdiction in the Master of the Rolls and got Jurisdiction Fraud Proof against him. It is the Decision Disclosure Failure by the Judge and a Bundle Filing Failure Dismissal Fraud by the Court of Appeal Lawyer. The Pending Adjudication Enforcement Stay Protection Rights survive Issue Denial Frauds and Case Dismissal Frauds.

The 2020 000286 Hearing Event in June 2020 got a Fraud Appeal by the Equity Lawyer and Pending Issue Reference 2020 10942 and Appeal Issue Denial Fraud Proof against the Court of Appeal. The Pending Adjudication Enforcement Stay Protection Rights survive Issue Denial Frauds. The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Trial Listing was a Protection Breach Contempt Fraud.

The Contempt Claim Fraud 2019 004208 Trial Event on 21st July got Trial Fraud Conspiracy Proof against the State Lawyers, Solicitor General and Trial Judges until Appeal Lord Justice lost confidence. He used Pending Adjudication Enforcement Stay Protection Rights for a Trial Adjournment and made Trial Orders that were Protection Breach Frauds.  

The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Trial Date Notice and Case Readiness Enquiry Communications that omit Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis is Bias Fraud Proof and Protection Breach Fraud Proof against the State Lawyers, Solicitor General and High Court. Contempt Remedies are subject to Full Disclosure Conditions. The Trial Readiness Communications revealed use of the Old Bundle with No Bundle Additions that are Evidence Exclusion Fraud Proof against the State Lawyers and Solicitor General.  

The Equity Lawyer will use the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Trial and Fraud Proof against the Law Courts for a Public Gallery Witnesses Attendance Rights Application and Protection Enforcement Application and Conflict Disqualification Recusal Application.  The Conflict Disqualification includes the use of Kidney Failure Treatment Denial Frauds in 2018 and 2019 and use of End-Stage Kidney Failure Emergency Treatment for a Urea Poison Fraud against the Equity Lawyer.

The Equity Lawyer gives Advance Notice that Protection Enforcement Failures, Recusal Failures and Urea Poisoning Investigation Failures will get Fraud Appeals to the Court of Appeal.

The Equity Lawyer gives Advanced Notice that Kidney Failure results in Chemical Imbalances that require a Special Diet. Kidney Transplants are subject to a Physical Fitness Qualification. Fitness Efforts do Body Damage that requires Rest Periods for Body Repairs. The Body uses Sleep Chemistry to force Rest Periods. Broomfield Hospital denies access to Medical Records including Blood Test Results. The Renal Team takes Blood Samples but denies Results Feedback unless they have an Imbalance Panic. The Equity Lawyer has been on a steep Learning Curve using Skin Condition, Fitness Efforts, Repair Rests, Health Feelings, Food Taste and Energy Deficits to assess Chemical Balances. In late October 2020, a High Potassium Imbalance got Energy Deficits and a Panic Notice from the Renal Team. He slept for 17 of 24 hours on the Time Reset Weekend. He tries Diet Changes to restore the Chemical Balances.  He gives Advance Notice that a 1 Day Trial will get an Adjournment Application when he has had enough, and a Trial Fraud Appeal if it is refused. The Equity Lawyer will attempt to file and serve Remedy Proposals before the Trial Date.

The Cyprus Gardens Land Fraud F02ED793 got Criminal Conspiracy Proof for Citizen Mr Hastunc against the Landlord, Lawyers and Top Judges. An Adjournment Fraud stopped the Possession Denial Appeal of the Landlord getting a Hearing Audio Record of the Citizen presenting the Criminal Conspiracy Proof. They ignored the Adjourned Appeal and issued a Case Review Notice. The Review Response dated 26th October 2020 of the Citizen is attached. Most of the Land Frauds got Physical Possession for Organised Criminals before Top Judges lost confidence. The Cyprus Gardens Land Fraud is an exception. The Possession Fraud failed. The Corona Virus Emergency prevented Citizen Mr Hastunc making the best of it. He is a Talented Chef but has Limited Business Skills. The Market Conditions need people the Talented Chef can engage with on Equal Terms to develop a New Business using Old Recipes for a Fashion Food Brand.

The Registered Fish Buyer 100903, Mr Brian Barbrook, is 66 years old and a Talented Hobby Fisherman. The Fish Buyer Registration enables him to participate in Fish Community Activities.  The Equity Lawyer thought he had potential for developing the Fashion Food Brand. On 30th July 2020, the Equity Lawyer contacted the Fish Buyer. On the evidence available that contact identified the Fish Buyer as a Ruin Fraud Target for the Protection Fraud Network. They had nothing. They decided to make something of nothing. The Dredging Process forces mud and sand into the fish and scrapes most of the flesh off the bones. In October 2019 the Fish Buyer and a Homeless Woman were in a harbour. Fishermen gave them Dredge Damaged Fish. He wanted it for Fish Bait. She wanted what she considered to be an edible bit for food. Fish Inspectors examined the Damaged Fish, used an Eating Quality Fitness Pretence Fraud for an Unrecorded Fish Purchase Investigation Fraud and used Mud Weight for a Fish Weight Fraud. The Homeless Woman now has Temporary Housing and is a Willing Witness for the Citizen against the State. An 11 Months Investigation Delay raises Reasonable Suspicions of a Case Closure and then a Case Reopening Fraud. The Fish Sale Investigation PFV6212DE has a Recorded Interview Appointment at 10.00 on Friday 30th October 2020 needs a 200-mile round trip by the Fish Buyer. The Investigation PFV6212DE Fraud Complaint dated 26th October 2020 is attached. This Royal Commission Email is a Fraud Complaint Service Notice. It will get a Conflict Disqualification Recusal by the Senior Investigator and a Case Reference to a Credibly Independent Party and a Pending Investigation Adjournment of the Interview Appointment or Additional Fraud Proof against the Senior Investigator and Protection Fraud Network.

The Investigation Fraud will not prejudice the Fashion Food Brand. The Talented Chef and Talented Fisherman have met, got on well and agreed to do business.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis 

2020-10-26-Royal-Commission-Lease-Claim-Fraud-F02ED793-Case-Review-Response-of-the-Citizen-Mr-Hastunc-v-Eatsnow-Estates-Limited

2020-10-26-Royal-Commission-First-Fish-Sale-Crime-Investigation-PFV6212DE-Fraud-Complaint-Notice-of-Citizen-Mr-Barbrook-v-Marine-Management-Organisation