Equity Governance UK

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Officers and Law Court Judges,

The Context, Motive and Case Dismissal Statement dated 30^th November 2020 of the Equity Lawyer motivated Top Judges demand a Framing Fraud as a Discredit Fraud against Citizen Mr Taylor. Corrupt Officers demanded Before Event Protection Fraud Proof for the Investigation Frauds of the Framing Fraud. They accepted the Restraint Breach Finding Fraud and Contempt Liability Finding Fraud dated 16^th December 2020 and the Reasons Fraud dated 18^th December 2020 against the Equity Lawyer as the Before Event Protection Fraud Proof. The Statement was designed to service Defence Case of the Equity Lawyer and the Defence Case of Framing Fraud Victims, whoever they were, if there were any.

At 21.18 on 23^rd December 2020 Citizen Mr Taylor telephoned the Equity Lawyer and informed him of the Framing Fraud Investigation that started on Tuesday 21^st December 2020. They discussed the both cases. At 21:32 a Witness Statement Request text from Citizen Mr Taylor to the Equity Lawyer reads, ‘Dear Edward Ellis. I request for the evidence of your case and how it impacts on mine. Yours Sincerely. Matthew Taylor’.

The Royal Commission Email in the early hours of Christmas Eve give Prompt Notice to Citizens, Parliament and the Crown. The Investigations Frauds by Sussex Police included Computer Seizure Frauds. Citizens will please inform Citizen Mr Taylor about this Royal Commission Email and ask him for the Email Addresses of the Investigating Officer and Defence Lawyers.

The Remedy Process needs an Evidence Officer by the Equity Lawyer to the State and Citizen Mr Taylor. He will produce it immediately after Christmas.

The Royal Commission Email at 17:09 on 21^st December 2020 got Automatic Replies including Civil Appeals – CMSC <civilappeals.cmsC@justice.gov.uk>, Civil Appeals – Urgent Work <CivilAppeals.Urgentwork@justice.gov.uk>, Civil Appeals – Associates <civilappeals.associates@justice.gov.uk>, Civil Appeals – Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk> and Fees Office using Fees (RCJ) <feesrcj@justice.gov.uk> at 17:02 on 22^nd December 2020 that reads, ‘Thank you for your email. If your query is in relation to Help With Fees, please ensure you have provided your HWF reference, a copy of the document you are applying for Help with Fees for, which Division the application is for and the court fee you would be paying. Any request that does not comply with this will not be processed.  For other Fees queries, we aim to respond within to emails within 3-5 working days.’

All of it is Appeal Notice Proof Positive for Honourable Parliamentarians, the Lord Bishops and Crown.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers, Law Court Judges and Royal Courts Fee Officers

The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Restraint Renewal Fraud, Imprisonment Committal Liability Trial Fraud and the Restraint Renewal Fraud Appeals 2020 0396  Dismissal Fraud and the Imprisonment Committal Application Permission Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 Dismissal Fraud complete a Criminal Conspiracy Proof Set needed for Corruption Findings and Dismissal Decisions against Top Judges.

The 2020 000286 Trial Frauds on 6^th and 9^th November 2020 are both subject to Fraud Appeals to the Court of Appeal and a Remedy Application to the High Court.

The Process Proof includes 3 Fee Remissions and the Receipt Signature at 10 23 on 24^th November 2020 from the Royal Courts Post Room for the Royal Mail Delivery NY022186103GB. They got Acknowledgement Denial Fraud Proof against the High Court and Court of Appeal. The Trial Frauds on 14th December 2020 included Case Management Investigation Denials Frauds to discover what the High Court and Court of Appeal did with them.  

The Fee Officers will please:

1. Issue the 3 Fee Remission Certificates.
2. Disclose the Online Process for  Fee Remission Certificates for the Liability Trial Fraud Appeal. Internet Searches did not get the Online Service used on 16th November 2020. 

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

The Best Advice is that the High Court Officers place the Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Trial Fraud Appeal Grounds dated 18th December 2020 before Trial Judge Mrs Cutts before she hands down the Reasons at 14.00 today.

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges

The Restraint Breach Imprisonment Committal Trial Fraud on 3^rd November 2020 got Conflict Qualification Fraud Proof, Recusal Fraud Proof, Trial Direction Fraud Proof and Adjournment Fraud Proof against Trial Judge Mr Jay. Court Records dated 19^th July 2016 evidenced that he had Witness Status, Restraint Breach Investigation Initiator Status, Investigator Status and Prosecutor Status all of which were Status Conflict Disqualification Proof against Adjudicator Status. The Recusal Refusal and Directions Order was issued. The next day he produced Recusal Judgment dated Friday 6^th November 2020 and then on Monday 9^th November 2020 made a Recusal and Trial Directions Confirmation Order. The Equity Lawyer used it in the High Court for a Remedy Application and in the Court of Appeal for Recusal Refusal Fraud, Trial Fraud Appeal and a Confirmation Directions Confirmation Fraud Appeal.  The Fee Remission Certificates and the Royal Courts Receipt Signature for a Registered Post Delivery are the Filing Proof. It got the 3^rd and 4^th Trial Stay Protection Rights from the Court of Appeal.

The Permission Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 was issued on Saturday 12^th December 2020. It was too late for the State to avoid the Adjourned Trial on Monday 14^th December 2020 getting an Audio Record. It got Protection Breach Contempt Fraud Conspiracy Proof against the State Counsel and the Trial Judge. State Counsel denied the Protection Rights. The Trial Judge committed a Protection Breach Fraud to commit the Liability Trial Frauds then used the Protection Rights for a Pending Appeal Penalty Adjournment.

The Prosecution Case was used Vulnerable Puppet Procurement Allegation Frauds against the Equity Lawyer that were Vulnerable Incapacity Defamation Frauds against Citizens Mr Paterson, Mr Bradley and Mr Awodiya. The State Counsel did not present any evidence to support the Defamation Frauds. The Trial Frauds included Defence Witness Denial Frauds.

On Monday 14^th December 2020 Citizen Mr Awodiya has used the Defamation Frauds against him for a Profession Unfitness Complaint against the State Counsel. He has offered a Witness Statement as Rebuttal Proof against the Defamation Frauds

Citizen Mr Paterson and Citizen Mr Bradley will please consider making Witness Statements for the Fraud Appeals and the Profession Unfitness Complaint. Citizen Mr Paterson has the disadvantage of being in prison. Citizen Mr Bradley has the disadvantage of the Long-Term Damage done by Anaesthetic Negligence in an Appendix Operation.

The Trial Judge said she would release Restraint Breach Finding, Contempt Finding and Reasons on Friday. The Equity Lawyer will file a Protection Breach and Liability Trial Fraud Appeal.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, Privy Counsellors, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges,

On 14^th December 2020 The Contempt Claim Fraud 2020 000286 Imprisonment Committal Trial got Trial Fraud Conspiracy Proof against the State Counsel and Trial Judge. They include a Validity Priority Denial Fraud, Pending Appeal Trial Protection Breach Contempt Fraud, Preliminary Issue Appeal Period Denial Contempt Fraud, Immediate Liability Trial Decision Fraud and Pending Appeal Penalty Hearing Stay.

The Liability Trial Prosecution Opening Speech was followed by the 1^st half of the Defence Testimony from Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis and then an Adjournment Order to 16^th December 2020.

The 2^nd half of the Defence Testimony will start with the Trial Fraud Explanation in the Additional Witness Statement dated 16^th December 2020. It is attached.

The Trial Frauds created a Conflict Disqualification for the Equity Lawyer against the Trial Judge.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

To: House of Commons Speaker, Prime Minister, Cabinet Officers, MPs, State Lawyers and Law Court Judges,

The Court of Appeal issued Contempt Committal Permission Fraud Appeal 2020 2069 on Saturday 12^th December 2020, which was Fling Day 173, and sent a Notice Email at 11.08 that day. The Equity Lawyer had a Dialysis Session, returned from the hospital, discovered that the local Post Office was the only place he could get printing done and that they closed early, did not check the emails and so did not know about the Sealed Appellant Notice when he did the printing. The Appeal Grounds, Sealed Appellant Notice, Issue Notice and Respondent’s Notice are attached by way of service on the State.

The Daily Courts List reveals the 2020 000286 Adjourned Trial is on 14^th December 2020 in Royal Court 14 before High Court Justice Mrs Cutts. The Case Dismissal Documents Schedule of the Equity Lawyer are attached. The last 21 are in bold type and will be attached to a series of Filing and Service Emails to the State, Court and Parliament. The Equity Lawyer has prints for the Court, State and Himself. The prints were produced on an old printer at the local Post Office and are of poor quality. Some of the lines in the middle of the page on the later prints are in ordinary type but appear to be bold. It might cause some confusion when reading the Case Dismissal Statement dated 30^th November 2020 because some of the content is in bold type. There is no need for reprints because the Dismissal Brief Representations dated 30^th November 2020 restate what is in bold type.  Case Dismissal Statement Error Correction Notices

151 delete ‘8^th’ and insert ‘11^th’ [March 2008…]

183 delete ‘was’ insert ‘into’ [a Remedy Process Asset.]

272 delete ‘2020’ insert ‘2018’ [Prime Minister Mrs May went to South Africa…]

The omission of the Shop Theft Claims QB 2019 003741 and 003984 was not an error. It was impossible to include all the Remedy Process Cases in the Case Dismissal Statement

Further Correction and Disclosure Rights Reserved

The Daily Courts List omits the Court Number but reveals Before MR JUSTICE JAY Monday, 14th December 2020 At half-past 10 FOR TRIAL (By Microsoft Teams. For details on accessing the hearing, please e-mail qbjudgeslistingoffice@justice.gov.uk} QB-2020-002450 Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors.

Formal Complaint by the Equity Lawyer against the High Court Listing Office that the List Publicity denies Citizens the Court Number needed to inform the 2020 002450 Parties and Representatives that Trial Unfitness Proof got a Forced Recusal from Justice Mr Jay.

Polite Request that if Citizens feel the need to discover the Court Number and inform the Case 2020 002450 Parties and Representatives of the Trial Unfitness Proof. The Best Advice the Same Notice to Both Parties using prints of this email that:

1. Joshua Rosenberg wrote the Trial Criticisms Article about Justice Mr Jay that was in the June 2020 Issue of the Law Society Gazette
2. The Case 2020 000286 Forced Recusal from Justice Mr Jay and a Recusal Article in the Law Society Gazette  
3. Joshua Rosenberg has Email Notice of 2020 000286 Trial Frauds that got the Forced Recusal

Reserved Rights for the Equity Lawyer to make Without Noticed Remedy Applications for the Reason that the Corruption Remedy Process needs discovery how the State Counsel and Trial Judge deal with them.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis